meeting + privacy lists

I'm open Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday. I would like to
attend, so if
these days are options I would much prefer one of them.


--
Chris Mullins
http://www.co
versant.net/blogs/cmullins



-----Original Message-----
From: council-bouncesjabber.org [mailto:council-bouncesjabber.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:29 AM
To: Jabber Council discussion list
Subject: Re: [Council] meeting + privacy lists

I'm flexible on the time. We could even do this Tuesday
(tomorrow) if
that's better.

Chris Mullins wrote:
> I'll try to make it. 
> 
> I've got a meeting scheduled with the EDD's
Architecture Review Board,
> and they haven't yet let me know when I'm presenting. 
> 
> As soon as I get a concrete answer, I'll post it here.
Fortunately,
with
> 5 members there's still a quorum even if I can't make
it.
> 
> --
> Chris Mullins
> http://www.co
versant.net/blogs/cmullins
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: council-bouncesjabber.org
[mailto:council-bouncesjabber.org]
On
> Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 10:15 AM
> To: counciljabber.org
> Subject: [Council] meeting + privacy lists
> 
> OK, let's hold a brief meeting this Wednesday (October
4) at 17:00
UTC,
> that's 18:00 UTC+1. If that time does not work, please
post to the
list.
> I can do 18:00 or 19:00 or whatever if that's
preferable. The meeting
> will be held in xmpp:councilconference.jabber.org (our
usual venue).
> 
> A proposed agenda is here:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/council/meetings/agendas/200
6-10-04.html
> 
> The agenda is so brief because:
> 
> (1) I'm deep in revisions to the XMPP RFCs
> 
> (2) I'm working to re-launch xmpp.org on Wednesday
> 
> (3) the Council needs to select a Chair in order to
function properly
> (e.g., it's the Chair who sets the agenda for meetings)
> 
> (4) the Council has a backlog of proposed specs to
consider, see the
> last agenda from the Fifth Council:
> 
> http://www.jabber.org/council/meetings/agendas/200
6-09-13.html
> 
> (5) I've received some other proposals too but have
been waiting to
> announce them until the JEP->XEP transition is
finished
> 
> So I propose that we hold a brief orientation meeting
this week and
then
> hold a more substantive meeting next week.
> 
> But one item we need to vote on (IMHO) is approving
version 1.4 of
> JEP-0016, which now contains all and only the content
from Section 10
of
> RFC 3291 (i.e., privacy lists) and which I propose we
change from a
> Draft Standards Track JEP to an Active Historical JEP.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
>