What should happend inside a Client with negative priority?

Hello,
I am not sure at this point, what should happens with a
negative
priority?
If an user have only positive values, the message should
received from
the highest value.
But for example an user have:
JID/Home 1
JID/Mobile -1
When I send a message to JID it should received from
"Home", but if I
understand the docu correct the message to the JID should
not received
from "Mobile" if "Home" goes offline
automatic, or not? Only when I
send it explicit to JID/Mobile, is this correct?

I wonder about this, because I can send with all clients
directly to an
JID with a negative priority.

Peter



_______________________________________________
This is JUser -- a mailing list for end
users of Jabber clients.

To unsubscribe, go to the following web 
page, scroll all the way down, and type 
in your email address:

http://
mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/juser
_______________________________________________

On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 20:26 +0200, Peter Flindt wrote:
> Hello,
> I am not sure at this point, what should happens with a
negative
> priority?
> If an user have only positive values, the message
should received from
> the highest value.
> But for example an user have:
> JID/Home 1
> JID/Mobile -1
> When I send a message to JID it should received from
"Home", but if I
> understand the docu correct the message to the JID
should not received
> from "Mobile" if "Home" goes
offline automatic, or not? Only when I
> send it explicit to JID/Mobile, is this correct?

Yes.

-- 
Groetjes,

ralphm

_______________________________________________
This is JUser -- a mailing list for end
users of Jabber clients.

To unsubscribe, go to the following web 
page, scroll all the way down, and type 
in your email address:

http://
mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/juser
_______________________________________________

Hi Peter!

Peter Flindt schrieb:
> When I send a message to JID it should received from
"Home", but if I
> understand the docu correct the message to the JID
should not received
> from "Mobile" if "Home" goes
offline automatic, or not? Only when I
> send it explicit to JID/Mobile, is this correct?

Right.

> I wonder about this, because I can send with all
clients directly to an
> JID with a negative priority.

Well the routing of the message is something the server
implementation
does. So if you receive it on the session with negative
priority (and
the message was addressed to your JID without a resource)
there has been
a fault at your server.

Maybe the server is using old software that predates the
rule for
handling negative priority. Especially I know of jabberd up
to version
1.4.3 that is not aware of handling negative priority. All
negative
priorities are handled as priority "0" in that old
version.

So if you want to continue studying the behaviour, you
should now
contact your server administrator and ask him which software
he is using.


Matthias

-- 
Matthias Wimmer      Fon +49-700 77 00 77 70
Züricher Str. 243    Fax +49-89 95 89 91 56
81476 München        http://ma.tthias.eu/

_______________________________________________
This is JUser -- a mailing list for end
users of Jabber clients.

To unsubscribe, go to the following web
page, scroll all the way down, and type
in your email address:

http://
mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/juser
_______________________________________________

Matthias Wimmer wrote :
> Hi Peter!

> Peter Flindt schrieb:
>> When I send a message to JID it should received
from "Home", but if I
>> understand the docu correct the message to the JID
should not received
>> from "Mobile" if "Home" goes
offline automatic, or not? Only when I
>> send it explicit to JID/Mobile, is this correct?

> Right.

>> I wonder about this, because I can send with all
clients directly to an
>> JID with a negative priority.

> Well the routing of the message is something the server
implementation
> does. So if you receive it on the session with negative
priority (and
> the message was addressed to your JID without a
resource) there has been
> a fault at your server.

> Maybe the server is using old software that predates
the rule for
> handling negative priority. Especially I know of
jabberd up to version
> 1.4.3 that is not aware of handling negative priority.
All negative
> priorities are handled as priority "0" in
that old version.

> So if you want to continue studying the behaviour, you
should now
> contact your server administrator and ask him which
software he is using.


> Matthias

AAHH OK, thanks for the info. ;)

Peter



_______________________________________________
This is JUser -- a mailing list for end
users of Jabber clients.

To unsubscribe, go to the following web 
page, scroll all the way down, and type 
in your email address:

http://
mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/juser
_______________________________________________