Ditto
I have the scars to prove it.
Bob Runnels
We Energies
-----Original Message-----
From: nortel-list-bounces tgrace.com
[mailto:nortel-list-bouncestgrace.com] On Behalf Of Al
Gillis
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 5:02 AM
To: Mailing list for Northern Telecom related issues
Subject: Re: [Nortel-list] Hands Free
It's pretty clear to me that Robert has been on this road
before and has
learned from his experience! He speaks with great wisdom!
Good call, robert!
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Williams" <roberttrca.com>
To: "Mailing list for Northern Telecom related
issues"
<nortel-listtgrace.com>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Nortel-list] Hands Free
> My suggestion is to give her back the 2616: If she's
the call center
sup,
> then she needs to be happy, and it sounds like she's
convinced that's
what
> she neess... so the simplest way to placate her is to
give her the
> 2616...(unless it's actually physically
impossible/incompatible with
your
> current schema, which if you're running 39xx sets,
I'd be surprised)
>
> I've quit even TRYING to fight or dictate
policy/standards call cneter
> supervisors and secretaries of Presidents.... it's
justa bout useless
in
> the
> end, and placating these positions (and a few more) is
a LOT easier
than
> dealing witht hte constant complaints from those people
when they
aren't
> happy- because no matter the technical reason that a
39xx is better
for
> this
> application than a 2616, all the President or the VP in
charge o fthe
call
> center is likely to hear is "My best call center
supervisor can't
perform
> their job in an efficient manner because they have
phone problems.
The
> new
> phone doesn't work, FOR THEM, as well as the old one
did. Switch it
> back."
>
>
>
>
> Robert Williams
> Project Manager
> Telecom Remarketing Corporation of America
> 940.323.2605 (desk)
> 940.891.1075 (fax)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nortel-list-bouncestgrace.com
> [mailto:nortel-list-bouncestgrace.com]On Behalf Of
Mike Grantham
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 9:04 AM
> To: Nortel List
> Subject: [Nortel-list] Hands Free
>
>
> I recently installed a 3905 in my call center and
connected a wireless
> headset, a CS50, to it, for the call center supervisor.
The
supervisor
> is now complaining that she can no longer answer the
call to her PDN
> (key 1) by depressing the button on the headset like
she used to do
when
> it was connected to the old phone, a 2216. In addition,
she claims
that
> the 2216/CS50 combo would do the following:
>
>
>
> CS50 power on and on her head - DN buzzes when called
>
> CS50 power off and in cradle (re-charge) - DN rings
when called
>
>
>
> I have changed the CLS from BUZZ to RNGI and RNGB but
have not gotten
> the results the call center supervisor wants. She
wants me to take
the
> 3905 out and give her back the 2216 which I would
rather not do.
>
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
> Mike Grantham
>
> Senior Engineer - ICT
>
> Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.
>
> 352 473 1405 office
>
> 352 473 1903 fax
>
> 352 258 5978 cell
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
____________
____
> __
>
> To manage your subscription, visit
> ht
tp://www.tgrace.com/mailman/listinfo/nortel-list
>
>
____________________________________________________________
____________
____
> __
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
____________
______
>
> To manage your subscription, visit
> ht
tp://www.tgrace.com/mailman/listinfo/nortel-list
>
>
____________________________________________________________
____________
______
____________________________________________________________
____________
______
To manage your subscription, visit
ht
tp://www.tgrace.com/mailman/listinfo/nortel-list
____________________________________________________________
____________
______
____________________________________________________________
__________________
To manage your subscription, visit ht
tp://www.tgrace.com/mailman/listinfo/nortel-list
____________________________________________________________
__________________
|
>
> I still owe the list some kind of alternative proposal
for discovery of
> translation services. For better or worse, I've been
stuck in a parallel
> internal debate about how to describe and provide
translation services over
> RESTy HTTP. This has been more pressing for me, as
I've got multiple
> applications breathing down my collar. I hope it will
teach me more about
> the right way to present this service over XMPP.
The fact that over XMPP you discover translation services
using JEP-0030
(Service Discovery) does not mean that you can't discover
them in other
ways using other protocols. So even if discovering
translation services
via JEP-0030 is a SHOULD or MUST in XMPP band, that's what
I call a
hypothetical imperative: if you discover via XMPP, you MUST
use JEP-0030
(but if you discover outside the XMPP band, use some other
mechanisms
that are defined elsewhere).
> If we feel that supporting automated discovery is a MAY
rather than a
> SHOULD, we can start planning for interop testing now.
ORF in July?
The interop testing planned for July will cover RFCs 3920
and 3921 only
(plus, perhaps, JEP-0030).
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -