>> One other possibility which comes to mind is
agressive compiler
>> optimization; packet is never written to in _srv_rr
and is marked const
>> in the definition of dn_expand, so the compiler
_might_ silently change
>> that to a call-by-reference in order to save a copy
operation. But I
>> admit that I'm really guessing hard here..
> As long as it is not static function, the compiler will
have a hard work
> if it changes the signature of a function. Changing it
would cause
> problems when the code object gets linked against
another code object.
Well, a short look in the code shows that _srv_rr is a
static function,
so that doesn't contradict my theory. My version of
jabberd-2.0s11 was
compiled with "-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe".
Maybe somebody whose version works could try to compile
resolver again
with the above flags and look if it's still working? For the
other way
round, you could try to find out your CFLAGS and post them..
Yours, Florian
_______________________________________________
JAdmin mailing list
JAdmin jabber.org
http:/
/mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jadmin
FAQ: http://ww
w.jabber.org/about/jadminfaq.shtml
_______________________________________________
|