|
List Info
Thread: RE: Slide DB2 pureXML Adapter
|
|
| RE: Slide DB2 pureXML Adapter |

|
2007-02-22 21:32:33 |
|
| Rafael,
This looks very interesting, I will get right on
it.
Michael Oliver
Cell: 518-378-6154
Skype: MikeOliverAZ
Phone:702-866-9034
Hi Mike,
> I would love to review the adapter and commit that to the project, > and I would add my own Derby adapter. Thanks
Mike for reviewing it.
Here it is (attached below)! I hope
you like it.
This DB2 pureXML v9 adapter is an enhancement to
the existing DB2 v8.1 adapter. This simplifies the database schema and
allows you to store XML documents in an XML column.
In this zip file you
will find the following files:
slide/build.xml This is the ant build
configuration file
slide/ConfiguringPureXMLAdapter.rtf This
is a readme file that describes what's new with this adapter and how to
configure it. How do we go about updating Slides web pages with this
configuration information? Can we add a section to this URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/howto-j2eestore.html
?
slide/db2purexml-stores-1.0.jar This
contains the adapter classes.
slide/domain.xml This is a sample
slide configuration file for the DB2 pureXML adapter.
slide/PUREXMLSP.html This is javadoc for
the Stored Procedures used by the adapter.
slide/dbsetup/DB2XMLFUNCTIONS.jar This
is a DB2 stored procedure used to update xml documents. Here is an article
describing this SP: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0605singh/
This only includes the class
files. The source can be found from the above.
slide/dbsetup/PUREXMLSP.jar This jar
contains the SP used by the DB2 pureXML adapter. This includes the source
and class files.
slide/dbsetup/setup.db2 This is a db2
sql script to create and configure the database and create all the necessary
database objects.
slide/com/ibm/db2/purexml This contains
the source for the DB2 pureXML adapater.
This adapter works with the free
version of DB2 v9, DB2 Express-C: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/db2/udb/db2express/
We
have run the four test lists (functional, bind, deltaV, DASL) and we get about
the same results as you do from the other relational adapters. There were
a couple of places where we got differences but that was expected due to the
different implementation.
Please let me know what you think and if we
need to fix/enhance
anything.
regards, <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Rafael |
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|