Uh, ahh, after deleting ~/.penrose/config.xml, which was
leftover from
a test with pensrose-studio 1.2.1, I could finally start,
add a
connection and connect!
Great
Martin
P.S.: I still would be intersted in building it from
repository and
running inside eclipse 3.3.
On 22 Aug., 11:59, mdm <martinbuech... yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi at penrose,
>
> The build instructions onhttp://docs.safehaus.org/display/PENROSE/Buildin
g+Penrose+Studio
> for penrose studio 1.2 state that one should execute
>
> ant build-linux
>
> for my platform. But this target does not exist in
build.xml. I also
> could not find any studio related code in branch 1.2
from
>
> https://svn.sa
fehaus.org/repos/penrose
>
> And: Running in eclipse seems to be also
outdated:http://
>
docs.safehaus.org/display/PENROSE/Running+Penrose+Studio+in+
Eclipse
>
> The README.txt of the linux binary package penrose-
> studio-1.2.4-1.i386.rpm.bin, states the repository path
as
>
> https://svn
.safehaus.org/repos/penrose-mt
>
> which also does not exist.
>
> When I start the binary release I get the error:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument cannot be
null
> at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:3358)
> at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:3297)
> at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:3268)
> at
org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.error(Widget.java:434)
> at
org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TableItem.setText(TableItem.java:
> 1148)
> at
org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TableItem.setText(TableItem.java:
> 1169)
> at
>
org.safehaus.penrose.studio.project.ProjectDialog.createCont
rol(ProjectDialog.java:
> 127)
> at
>
org.safehaus.penrose.studio.project.ProjectDialog.<init&g
t;(ProjectDialog.java:
> 76)
> at
>
org.safehaus.penrose.studio.PenroseWorkbenchWindowAdvisor.pr
eWindowOpen(PenroseWorkbenchWindowAdvisor.java:
> 80)
> at
>
org.eclipse.ui.internal.WorkbenchWindow.fireWindowOpening(Wo
rkbenchWindow.java:
> 1095)
> ...
>
> If I try to add a conection it hangs when testing this,
without
> testing saving the connection does also not work.
>
> Please help me to understand why you publish such a
mess. Besides
> that, I think penrose is a brilliant idea, but the
implementation of
> it does not impress me at all so far ;=)
>
> Regards
>
> Martin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "safehaus" group.
To post to this group, send email to safehausgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
safehaus-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://
groups.google.com/group/safehaus?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
