|
List Info
Thread: b/w limit M320 FPC2
|
|
| b/w limit M320 FPC2 |

|
2006-04-06 14:11:11 |
Folks,
FPC2 nominally do 10G, and then nominally 2.5G per PIC.
Think about the 4xGE PIC and 4 of them on a FPC2. How
'dynamic' is that setup going to be, and what is the hard
limit for one of these PICs under these circumstances?
Thanks,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
|
| exam for JNCIP/M SERIES EXAM |

|
2006-04-06 14:20:55 |
DEAR ALL
Is there is any one preparing this exam so we can share the
LAB and
resources plus material !!
Best regards,
Adnan habib
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
|
| b/w limit M320 FPC2 |

|
2006-04-06 19:33:35 |
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:11:11PM +0200, Alexander Koch
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> FPC2 nominally do 10G, and then nominally 2.5G per PIC.
> Think about the 4xGE PIC and 4 of them on a FPC2. How
> 'dynamic' is that setup going to be, and what is the
hard
> limit for one of these PICs under these circumstances?
I could tell you what I've seen from M160 FPC2's, but I
assume on M320 it
is going to be completely different.
The story I've heard is that outside of the new FPC4s for
OC768/etc (which
have true 40G asics), the M320/T series architecture only
has 20G
forwarding ASICs. Thus a T640 FPC3 is 2x20G, a T320/M320
FPC3 is 1x20G,
but FPC2 and FPC1s are also 1x20G (also each FPC has its own
Internet
Processor type asics, and does distributed IP lookups). This
is completely
different from the M160 architecture, which is just a dumb
FPC talking to
4 individual SFMs, each of which provide 3.2Gbps of capacity
into the FPC
(so that when all 4 SFMs are operating you get 12.8Gbps of
capacity into
an FPC2).
Can anyone confirm if the M320 FPC2's actually make a full
20G of
bandwidth (or close to it minus overhead) available, so that
filling it
with PB-4GE PICs is not oversubscribing it?
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/r
as
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41
5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
|
| b/w limit M320 FPC2 |

|
2006-04-12 11:21:24 |
Hello,
what is it I have to do to get the answer on this one? I can
open a case for that, but that path I did not want to go for
potentially obvious reasons. I am surely willing to go that
way, if it is the only one.
Regards,
Alexander
On Thu, 6 April 2006 16:11:11 +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
> Folks,
>
> FPC2 nominally do 10G, and then nominally 2.5G per PIC.
> Think about the 4xGE PIC and 4 of them on a FPC2. How
> 'dynamic' is that setup going to be, and what is the
hard
> limit for one of these PICs under these circumstances?
>
> Thanks,
> Alexander
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
|
| b/w limit M320 FPC2 |

|
2006-04-12 15:54:23 |
Hi,
According to the documentation you can use PB-4GE-SFP in
FPC2 but my
be bandwith will be oversubscribed. I think it is like
M5/M7i, you can
put 4 1GE PICs but can't use full 4Gbps, because
throughput rate is
3.2Gbps full duplex.
Regards,
George
Alexander Koch wrote:
>Hello,
>
>what is it I have to do to get the answer on this one? I
can
>open a case for that, but that path I did not want to go
for
>potentially obvious reasons. I am surely willing to go
that
>way, if it is the only one.
>
>Regards,
>Alexander
>
>On Thu, 6 April 2006 16:11:11 +0200, Alexander Koch
wrote:
>
>
>>Folks,
>>
>>FPC2 nominally do 10G, and then nominally 2.5G per
PIC.
>>Think about the 4xGE PIC and 4 of them on a FPC2.
How
>>'dynamic' is that setup going to be, and what is
the hard
>>limit for one of these PICs under these
circumstances?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alexander
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
>h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
|
| b/w limit M320 FPC2 |

|
2006-04-13 06:56:05 |
Alexander,
there is no such restriction on M320 and T-Serie
platforms
for 4xGE PIC since the IO ASIC is different. We
have two on
one FPC Type 2 and each of them serves 2 PIC
Slots. The IO
asic is designed to deliver 10G further
into the PFE
complex. So you can fill up all 4 pic slots and
should get
full b/w throughput.
Josef
Wednesday, April 12, 2006, 1:21:24 PM, you wrote:
AK>
AK>
AK> Hello,
AK>
AK> what is it I have to do to get the answer on this
one? I can
AK> open a case for that, but that path I did not want
to go for
AK> potentially obvious reasons. I am surely willing to
go that
AK> way, if it is the only one.
AK>
AK> Regards,
AK> Alexander
AK>
AK> On Thu, 6 April 2006 16:11:11 +0200, Alexander Koch
wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> FPC2 nominally do 10G, and then nominally 2.5G per
PIC.
>> Think about the 4xGE PIC and 4 of them on a FPC2.
How
>> 'dynamic' is that setup going to be, and what is
the hard
>> limit for one of these PICs under these
circumstances?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander
AK>
AK> _______________________________________________
AK> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
AK> h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
AK>
AK>
AK>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp puck.nether.net
h
ttp://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
|
|
[1-6]
|
|