On Nov 29, 2007 5:45 PM, Mikal <mikal.villa gmail.com> wrote:
> I have moved some information over to the techbase, but
I really don't know
> what other I should do..
> Should I move the whole site to the techbase?
>
>
Cool, someone else beat me to it  . I didn't
actually look very hard,
just noticed that recent KDE release announcements pointed
to
quality.kde.org as one option for getting involved, and
followed the
link.
Also, techbase.kde.org/Contribute still links to
quality.kde.org so
perhaps it should link to one of the page you have done on
the
techbase?
>
> On 11/29/07, Adriaan de Groot <grootkde.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thursday 29 November 2007 07:10:39 George
Goldberg wrote:
> > > Have just been looking at the quality team
web site, and realised that
> > > it is hideously out of date! I thought of
offering to contribute to
> >
> > Yes, it is, because the "quality team"
concept as originally started has
> > withered and died.
> >
> > > improving it, but actually I think it would
make more sense to create
> > > a 'quality team' page on techbase seeing as a
lot of the information
> > > is already there, and then point
quality.kde.org there. Would this be
> > > a welcome contribution or are there other
ideas out there for it?
> >
> > I believe Mikal was working on it -- please check
on techbase if there
> isn't
> > already that kind of stuff there.
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-quality mailing list
> > kde-qualitykde.org
> > htt
ps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mikal Villa
> _______________________________________________
> kde-quality mailing list
> kde-qualitykde.org
> htt
ps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
>
>
_______________________________________________
kde-quality mailing list
kde-qualitykde.org
htt
ps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
|