Le mercredi 28 mars 2007, Krzysztof Lichota a écrit :
> Kevin Krammer napisał(a):
> > On Thursday 22 March 2007 07:03 +0100, Kelly
wrote:
> >> I was somewhat curious; I was reading about
the project related to
> >> KPassivePopup, and the first thing I wondered
is, wouldn't it be better
> >> off as a DBus-registered daemon? Or am I
totally off base?
> >
> > My guess is that KNotify has (or will have) a
D-Bus interface just like
> > it had a DCOP interface.
>
> Will this interface be compatible with libnotify
interface used in
> Gnome? This would make writing interoperable apps
easier
No.
KNotify doesn't serve the same purpose as libnotify.
KNotify does powerfull and configurable notification to
application event.
(including passive popup and sound, but also everything
else)
"Gnome"'s libnotify is basically just used to
display passive popups.
(no per-event configuration, no others actions)
There is no link between KNotify and KPassivePopup (excepted
the fact that
KNotify uses KPassivePopup internally when it displays a
popup)
So having an another dbus daemon for displaying
KPassivePopup would make sens
only to be compatible with freedesktop's libnotify (and
KNotify would use
it)
There is a confusion because there is the "notify"
string in both name, but
theses daemons have few things in commons.
>> Visit
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
unsubscribe <<
|