List Info

Thread: Issue with KDevelop: Is it using different parsers in parallell for different puropuses?




Issue with KDevelop: Is it using different parsers in parallell for different puropuses?
user name
2006-08-17 06:41:22
> Från: mwoehlke <mwoehlketibco.com>
> Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > The KatePart internal "parser" should
really stay the stackmachine it is atm, 
> > it may get some more tuning for KDE 4,
> 
> Since we're on the subject, is "ability to pop
at the same time as push" 
> part of that "tuning"? (I know, wrong list,
but I think I already asked 
> there with no reply.)

It seems to be a somewhat sensitive subject. I hit that
limitation of Kate too a while ago and reported it. It even
took a great effort to make the developer admit that there
is something called "push" and that a stack is
involved at all. But you can skip the long discussion, read
the last few comments and vote for the feature: http://bug
s.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120544

Spamfritt e-postkonto - http://mail.spray.se/?t
argetcode=se_footer_________________________________________
______
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )