Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 19:32, mwoehlke wrote:
>> Matt Rogers wrote:
>>> On Thursday 17 August 2006 10:07, mwoehlke
wrote:
>>>> Matt Rogers wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday 17 August 2006 02:29, Jens
Herden wrote:
>>>>>>>>> are they actually used
anywhere? If not, then we can remove them
>>>>>>>>> and if we need them
later, then add them then.
>>>>>>>> Please don't. I know I
need to document them, but they do have a
>>>>>>>> purpose...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> projectDirectory == the dir
where the current project file is
>>>>>>>> located.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> projectsDirectory == the
dir where the user holds all of his project
>>>>>>>> folders ... perhaps this
can be renamed to better illustrate what it
>>>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Both of them are useful
though, please don't remove.
>>>>>>> But not all project folders are
in the same place, so I still don't
>>>>>>> see the point of either of
these functions since projectDirectory is
>>>>>>> duplicated from KDevProject and
well, right now, projectsDirectory
>>>>>>> doesn't make sense to me.
>>>>>> Oh that is new for me. I thought
that project files and folders must
>>>>>> have a common base folder? But the
project file can be at an arbitrary
>>>>>> location where also the hidden
.kde4 folder is created. Am I wrong
>>>>>> here?
>>>>> Yes, project files and folders must
reside under a particular folder.
>>>>> However, the project file can no longer
be stored at an arbitrary
>>>>> location. We might change that, dunno
yet, a lot of this stuff is still
>>>>> in flux.
>>>> Ok, I'll admit I don't understand
entirely what's going on here, but by
>>>> "project file", are we talking
about what in 3.x is 'foobar.kdevelop'?
>>>> (Private explanations welcome if you don't
want to clutter the list.)
>>> yes, that is correct.
>> Ok, so I am confused... KDevelop 4 is or is not
going to force all
>> projects to be in the same directory? Because that
would be A Bad
>> Thing... I seem to
have noticed contradictory statements in this
>> very thread, although this one was "we
haven't made up our minds", and
>> the other was a comfortable "no, we won't do
this".
>
> not all projects will have to be under than same
directory. the project file
> must be in the same directory as the toplevel directory
for the project.
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for clearing up my confusion.
I'm fine with the project file being necessarily at the
project root; I
think most people do things that way anyway...
> The thing we haven't made up our minds about is
whether to allow separation of
> the kdevelop project file from the actual source and
other things it
> describes.
Either way works for me, though as Jens points out, I can
understand why
people would want more flexibility.
--
Matthew
KATE: Awesome Text Editor
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel
|