branches/kdevelop/3.4/src

On Saturday 16 September 2006 03:03, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> What is the fix in the Kate code, btw? If it's this
"loop fix" there
> as well I think this is really dangerous.

The kate fix is perfectly safe, it just doesn't call the 
setMicroFocusHint if the widget doesn't have focus. The
KDevelop 
workaround is not so easy to do, it seems. :-( 

Andras
-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.o
rg
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:41, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 16.09.06 00:03:28, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> > A third party extension to Qt is making katepart
crash, which makes
> > KDevelop crash. Trying to paper over this in
KDevelop is the wrong
> > fix. It stinks that this bug has been around for 2
years now, but I
> > don't think that is a good enough reason to
introduce problems and
> > bugs (which this patch does, even if it also
helps) where it isn't
> > needed. (Don't have the XIM patch? Don't need
the fix, dont' want
> > the bugs.)
>
> FACK. XIM should be fixed, not worked around....

Good luck with that. I'd say XIM is perfectly fine, the
problem is 
somewhere else. Really, there is nothing wrong in that code.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.o
rg
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On 16.09.06 10:28:48, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:41, Andreas Pakulat
wrote:
> > On 16.09.06 00:03:28, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> > > A third party extension to Qt is making
katepart crash, which makes
> > > KDevelop crash. Trying to paper over this in
KDevelop is the wrong
> > > fix. It stinks that this bug has been around
for 2 years now, but I
> > > don't think that is a good enough reason to
introduce problems and
> > > bugs (which this patch does, even if it also
helps) where it isn't
> > > needed. (Don't have the XIM patch? Don't
need the fix, dont' want
> > > the bugs.)
> >
> > FACK. XIM should be fixed, not worked around....
> 
> Good luck with that. I'd say XIM is perfectly fine,
the problem is 
> somewhere else. Really, there is nothing wrong in that
code.

Should've had a coffee before posting ;)

I just misread this discussion as "the current fixes
in kate and konsole
are problematic". As it turns out they are not, I
better spent my time
on kdev4, once I have some ;)

Andreas

-- 
You will be imprisoned for contributing your time and skill
to a bank robbery.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel