List Info

Thread: Update the 3.4 building page




Update the 3.4 building page
user name
2006-11-26 17:45:51
Hi,

could someone with write-access to the website-sources
please update the
svn urls on the 3.4 build page? It says something about
trunk/KDE/kdevelop and branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop, which is
both wrong
for kdevelop3.4. KDevelop3.4 is using branches/kdevelop/3.4
as branch.

Andreas

-- 
Another good night not to sleep in a eucalyptus tree.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel
Update the 3.4 building page
user name
2006-11-27 09:41:56
On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:45, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could someone with write-access to the website-sources
please update the
> svn urls on the 3.4 build page?
> It says something about 
> trunk/KDE/kdevelop and branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop
Which is correct for KDevelop 3.3

> KDevelop3.4 is using branches/kdevelop/3.4 as branch.
Which is also correct. It just says KDE/3.5 as a branch
example!
It EXPLICITLY says that if you want another branch you need
to replace it.

Regards,

-- 
Amilcar Lucas
Webmaster
The KDevelop project

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel
Update the 3.4 building page
user name
2006-11-27 10:02:38
On 11/27/06, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas <webmasterkdevelop.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:45, Andreas Pakulat
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > could someone with write-access to the
website-sources please update the
> > svn urls on the 3.4 build page?
> > It says something about
> > trunk/KDE/kdevelop and branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop
> Which is correct for KDevelop 3.3
Which is obviously not relevant for the _3.4_ build page.

> > KDevelop3.4 is using branches/kdevelop/3.4 as
branch.
> Which is also correct. It just says KDE/3.5 as a branch
example!
> It EXPLICITLY says that if you want another branch you
need to replace it.
What's the point of having all these different version build
pages if
they don't have the version relevant information?

I'm not saying it strange that the documentation is outdated
(it's
documentation after all), but you seem to suggest Andreas'
suggestion
is somehow misguided? People do get confused by the current
page, we
see them on IRC regularly.

// jens

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel
[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )