Re: KDevelop UI

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Roberto Raggi wrote:

>
> Hi!
>
> Il giorno 20/lug/07, alle ore 00:54, Andreas Pakulat ha
scritto:
>>
>> KDevelop is not part of the upcoming KDE4 beta and
wasn't part of the
>> alpha2 that was released.
>>
>> It was part of the alpha1, but I think just due to
the lack of
>> communication (i.e. nobody asked us wether we want
to release with  
>> KDE
>> 4.0)
>
> yes, but what do you think is the first thing that a
KDevelop 3.x
> user will do after he installed KDE 4? start emacs?
>
>>
>> There's at least one flaw in your proposal: Matt
doesn't have the  
>> time
>
> if Matt doesn't have time you can merge your change as
long as the
> change does not introduce regressions

Except that I do have time. I just haven't been very active
because  
i've been mentoring two SoC students and also working with
one other  
person on helping them be a KDE developer. 

I'll be more active shortly, I imagine. 

>
>> (apparently) to do that. Also I don't really see
how that helps,
>> because
>> these branches would live really long. I mean I
currently think that
>
> that's not true. You don't have to merge when the
feature is
> finished. You have to merge when you have something!
and that
> something is good enough for /trunk.
>
>
>> include-dir stuff for qmake will take about at
least 2 more months  
>> and
>> thats only when I don't get a full-time job within
that timeframe
>> (which
>
> I understand that, but I hope you understand that a
feature that does
> not work is useless for other developers. It's true
that the final-
> awesome-version of the qmake project manager needs 2
months, but it
> is also true that you will have many
good-enough-to-be-integrate-in-/
> trunk versions of the qmake project manager in the next
weeks.
>
>
>> I hope I will). I personally don't see us releasing
anywhere close to
>
> good luck 
>
> ciao robe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

Matt


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGoBWqA6Vv5rghv0cRAlZvAJ4sU4pdg9dAZQFrXkACi4KQQF2TKQCf
XFvW
96268d9UytfJbpNrXuP3ipo=
=vlj0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On 19.07.07 20:53:46, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Roberto Raggi wrote:
> > Il giorno 20/lug/07, alle ore 00:54, Andreas
Pakulat ha scritto:
> >> KDevelop is not part of the upcoming KDE4 beta
and wasn't part of the
> >> alpha2 that was released.
> >>
> >> It was part of the alpha1, but I think just
due to the lack of
> >> communication (i.e. nobody asked us wether we
want to release with  
> >> KDE
> >> 4.0)
> >
> > yes, but what do you think is the first thing that
a KDevelop 3.x
> > user will do after he installed KDE 4? start
emacs?
> >
> >>
> >> There's at least one flaw in your proposal:
Matt doesn't have the  
> >> time
> >
> > if Matt doesn't have time you can merge your
change as long as the
> > change does not introduce regressions
> 
> Except that I do have time. I just haven't been very
active because  
> i've been mentoring two SoC students and also working
with one other  
> person on helping them be a KDE developer. 
> 
> I'll be more active shortly, I imagine. 

Very cool. BTW: I always tend to forget that you're not just
working on
KDevelop, which is why I think you've got too much real life
going on to
be more active :P

Andreas

-- 
Break into jail and claim police brutality.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel