Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 25.07.07 23:29:57, Matt Rogers wrote:
>> I'd recommend having a shared library that contains
all the parser
>> stuff which the tests can link against rather than
pulling in the
>> sources for the particular things to test. You
would also be able to
>> link the plugin against the shared library as well.
There's nothing
>> saying that any installed shared library has to
have public headers,
>> so we can just not install those and be ok.
>
> This is not just about the parser lib, but a general
problem. The thing
> with installing a shared library is that whenever
somebody changes the
> code in a BIC manner the version has to be increased
(AFAIK at least),
> which might be forgotten easily.
Even when the only thing linking against it is always
distributed at the
same time?
> I'm wondering wether there's a way to
> tell cmake to not recompile the sources for the tests,
which IMHO is the
> only benefit of using a shared lib for the parts of the
plugin.
The "convenience library" thing comes up
frequently, last I checked
there is no easy way to do it (so said the wiki anyway). Is
it possible
to make a static library instead? (Only the plugin and test
apps use it,
right? In which case the increased code size is not an
issue.)
--
Matthew
So, an astrophysicist, a quantum physicist, and an
astrologer walk into
a bar...
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel
|
