Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 26.07.07 10:33:04, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> The "convenience library" thing comes up
frequently, last I checked
>> there is no easy way to do it (so said the wiki
anyway). Is it possible
>> to make a static library instead? (Only the plugin
and test apps use it,
>> right? In which case the increased code size is not
an issue.)
>
> No, static libs are a no-go - AFAIK. It needs -fPIC on
64bit systems in
> various places... Tried that for the python plugin,
didn't work very
> well.
Well obviously it needs -fPIC, you're putting it into a
shared library
ultimately . What was
the problem with using -fPIC?
--
Matthew
So, an astrophysicist, a quantum physicist, and an
astrologer walk into
a bar...
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel
|