Re: branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop/lib/astyle

On 20.09.07 21:32:17, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> SVN commit 714911 by mueller:
> 
> fix compile

2 Problems:

a) this file is not from kdevelop, but from the astyle
sources. As
kdevelop compiles for me just fine, I'd like to ask you to
send this
patch along with the errors to the astyle developers

b) KDE/3.5/kdevelop/ is now "dead", i.e. its not
the stable KDevelop
anymore (as of 2 or 3 weeks ago). Would you mind comitting
this change
to branches/kdevelop/3.5/ as well?

KDevelop developers: Should we ask the release-team
about removing
branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop? Also that would make sure the
next KDE
release won't release kdevelop from
branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop...

Andreas

-- 
Don't worry so loud, your roommate can't think.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Sep 20, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:

> On 20.09.07 21:32:17, Dirk Mueller wrote:
>> SVN commit 714911 by mueller:
>>
>> fix compile
>
> 2 Problems:
>
> a) this file is not from kdevelop, but from the astyle
sources. As
> kdevelop compiles for me just fine, I'd like to ask you
to send this
> patch along with the errors to the astyle developers
>
> b) KDE/3.5/kdevelop/ is now "dead", i.e. its
not the stable KDevelop
> anymore (as of 2 or 3 weeks ago). Would you mind
comitting this change
> to branches/kdevelop/3.5/ as well?
>
> KDevelop developers: Should we ask the release-team
about removing
> branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop? Also that would make sure
the next KDE
> release won't release kdevelop from
branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop...
>
> Andreas

Sorry, but these changes need to stay since we're
distributing the  
astyle source code with KDevelop. Having this pushed up to
astyle  
upstream is nice, but not a requirement.

Also, I don't think we need to be removing
branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop  
or releasing from branches/kdevelop/3.5. We need to just let
the 3.x  
version of KDevelop die already. Why do we continue to
divide our  
resources, thus keeping KDevelop 4.0 from actually being
finished  
anytime soon?
- --
Matt


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFG8xovA6Vv5rghv0cRAvBSAJ47Ecu3hvdo7A/SJDIQbdHBtCseLgCg
i8Cb
OUkqTg0mnOujRVe2qOSq0XE=
=0FVh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

Alle giovedì 20 settembre 2007, Andreas Pakulat ha scritto:
> On 20.09.07 21:32:17, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > SVN commit 714911 by mueller:
> >
> > fix compile
>
> 2 Problems:
>
> a) this file is not from kdevelop, but from the astyle
sources. As
> kdevelop compiles for me just fine, I'd like to ask you
to send this
> patch along with the errors to the astyle developers
>
> b) KDE/3.5/kdevelop/ is now "dead", i.e. its
not the stable KDevelop
> anymore (as of 2 or 3 weeks ago). Would you mind
comitting this change
> to branches/kdevelop/3.5/ as well?
>
> KDevelop developers: Should we ask the release-team
about removing
> branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop? Also that would make sure
the next KDE
> release won't release kdevelop from
branches/KDE/3.5/kdevelop...
>
> Andreas

I feel problems coming for the release of KDevelop 3.5 and
its translations... 
I hope I'm wrong. 

-- 
A KDE Italian translator and KSniffer core developer
Slackware GNU/Linux current version - kernel 2.6.22.6
KDE Italia - http://www.kde-it.org/
KSniffer Website webmaster/sysadmin - http://www.ksniffer.org/


_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel