Re: KDE/kdevelop/languages/cpp/debugger

On Wednesday 28 November 2007 14:27:29 Hamish Rodda wrote:
> SVN commit 742615 by rodda:
> 
> Move the gdbmi command to an enumerated value, so that
we can do some more intelligent queue handling 
> later.

What "more intelligent queue handling" you have in
mind? Neither commit message nor (absent  )
comments in code make it clear.

- Volodya

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:44:04 pm Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007 14:27:29 Hamish Rodda
wrote:
> > SVN commit 742615 by rodda:
> >
> > Move the gdbmi command to an enumerated value, so
that we can do some
> > more intelligent queue handling later.
>
> What "more intelligent queue handling" you
have in mind? Neither commit
> message nor (absent  )
comments in code make it clear.

Eg, when performing two step operations, if the second step
operation comes 
before the -var-update, don't send the first -var-update and
only call it 
after the second step is complete.  Also, when retrieving
values, perform all 
scheduled stepping etc. first... and so on.  Should improve
performance 
significantly, given how long it seems to take to run
-var-update on complex 
debugging sessions.

Also, this is more object-oriented than before (still not
perfect, but it's a 
start).

Cheers,
Hamish.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel