On Saturday 15 December 2007 19:33:45 Matt Rogers wrote:
>
> On Dec 15, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 15 December 2007 18:38:49 you wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec 15, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Vladimir Prus
wrote:
> >>
> >>> SVN commit 748808 by vprus:
> >>>
> >>> Make use of GDB's support for pending
breakpoints in MI.
> >>>
> >>> With this commit, KDevelop4 starts to need
CVS HEAD of gdb.
> >>
> >> Sorry, but we cannot require CVS HEAD of gdb
for KDevelop 4. We need
> >> to at least support the last released version.
As I told Hamish, we
> >> don't know when gdb 6.8 is being released and
we don't know when
> >> KDevelop 4 is being released, so we can't
assume that a new GDB will
> >> come before KDevelop 4.
> >
> > gdb 6.8 is likely to be release in half-a-year. Do
you see it likely
> > that KDevelop4 will be ready in this timeframe?
> >
>
> That depends. Right now, there's discussions on the
release team list
> to release KDE 4.1 by the end of April and I don't know
if KDevelop 4
> will be ready by then.
Well, per:
http://sourceware
.org/gdb/schedule/
6.8 is supposed to come out in March.
> >> Please find some way to make this available
only if somebody is using
> >> CVS HEAD of gdb, and fail gracefully if they
have an older version.
> >
> > Well, "fail gracefully" can be either:
> >
> > - breakpoints don't work at all
> > - breakpoints in shared libraries don't work at
all
> >
> > Does either sound good to you?
> >
> > - Volodya
>
> *shrug* I don't know.
I don't know either. I plan to make KDevelop query the list
of MI features
that GDB provides, and with that it will be easy to make
decisions about this
specific thing, but basically we can't get bug-free
behaviour using old gdb.
- Volodya
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel
|
