soversion of kdevplatform libraries

Hi,

I just had a look at the installation of kdevplatform and
found that the
libraries all use the GENERIC_LIB_* stuff from kdelibs,
which gives us
soversion of 4 and version number of 4.0.0 (and soon 4.1.0).


IMHO thats a bit dishonest regarding the stability and
relatively
newness of those libraries. Also its a "huge" jump
from the public libs
in kdevelop3 (where the libs had soversion 0).

How does everybody feel about using soversion 1 and version
1.0.0 for
the initial release of kdevplatform? 

Andreas

-- 
Troubled day for virgins over 16 who are beautiful and
wealthy and live
in eucalyptus trees.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On Sunday 13 January 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a look at the installation of kdevplatform
and found that the
> libraries all use the GENERIC_LIB_* stuff from kdelibs,
which gives us
> soversion of 4 and version number of 4.0.0 (and soon
4.1.0).
>
> IMHO thats a bit dishonest regarding the stability and
relatively
> newness of those libraries. Also its a "huge"
jump from the public libs
> in kdevelop3 (where the libs had soversion 0).
>
> How does everybody feel about using soversion 1 and
version 1.0.0 for
> the initial release of kdevplatform?

Without looking at them, do they all have different names
now ?
If so, I think 1.0 is ok.

Alex

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On 14.01.08 20:36:11, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 13 January 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just had a look at the installation of
kdevplatform and found that the
> > libraries all use the GENERIC_LIB_* stuff from
kdelibs, which gives us
> > soversion of 4 and version number of 4.0.0 (and
soon 4.1.0).
> >
> > IMHO thats a bit dishonest regarding the stability
and relatively
> > newness of those libraries. Also its a
"huge" jump from the public libs
> > in kdevelop3 (where the libs had soversion 0).
> >
> > How does everybody feel about using soversion 1
and version 1.0.0 for
> > the initial release of kdevplatform?
> 
> Without looking at them, do they all have different
names now ?
> If so, I think 1.0 is ok.

Yes, all libraries have different names, or what exactly do
you mean?
Even if some of the kdevplatform libs would be named the
same as
kdevelop3 libs (which isn't the case as far as I can see)
all kdevelop3
libs have a soversion of 0, so 1 is greater than that
already...

Andreas

-- 
You have an ability to sense and know higher truth.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On 13.01.08 15:10:56, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just had a look at the installation of kdevplatform
and found that the
> libraries all use the GENERIC_LIB_* stuff from kdelibs,
which gives us
> soversion of 4 and version number of 4.0.0 (and soon
4.1.0). 
> 
> IMHO thats a bit dishonest regarding the stability and
relatively
> newness of those libraries. Also its a "huge"
jump from the public libs
> in kdevelop3 (where the libs had soversion 0).
> 
> How does everybody feel about using soversion 1 and
version 1.0.0 for
> the initial release of kdevplatform? 

This is a heads up for everyone compiling kdevelop4
regurlarly. I'm
going to commit the change on thursday evening (about 45
hours from
now). Matt already announced we're not following kdelibs
soversion on
k-c-d, so I'm taking that and the lack of reponses so far as
an "ok".

Anybody feel free to object and explain your reasoning.

And the real reason I'm notifying everybody in advance, is
that you're
going to need to remove all libxxx.so* from your
builddir/lib directory
and of course also from installdir/lib. So a build will take
some time.

Andreas

-- 
Go to a movie tonight.  Darkness becomes you.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

On Jan 15, 2008, at 5:18 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:

> On 13.01.08 15:10:56, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just had a look at the installation of
kdevplatform and found  
>> that the
>> libraries all use the GENERIC_LIB_* stuff from
kdelibs, which  
>> gives us
>> soversion of 4 and version number of 4.0.0 (and
soon 4.1.0).
>>
>> IMHO thats a bit dishonest regarding the stability
and relatively
>> newness of those libraries. Also its a
"huge" jump from the public  
>> libs
>> in kdevelop3 (where the libs had soversion 0).
>>
>> How does everybody feel about using soversion 1 and
version 1.0.0 for
>> the initial release of kdevplatform?
>
> This is a heads up for everyone compiling kdevelop4
regurlarly. I'm
> going to commit the change on thursday evening (about
45 hours from
> now). Matt already announced we're not following
kdelibs soversion on
> k-c-d, so I'm taking that and the lack of reponses so
far as an "ok".
>
> Anybody feel free to object and explain your
reasoning.
>
> And the real reason I'm notifying everybody in advance,
is that you're
> going to need to remove all libxxx.so* from your
builddir/lib  
> directory
> and of course also from installdir/lib. So a build will
take some  
> time.
>
> Andreas

Thanks for doing the work. Please go ahead when you're
ready.
--
Matt



_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel