List Info

Thread: Project Configuration




Project Configuration
country flaguser name
Germany
2008-03-08 12:49:50
While using kdevelop I've noticed that project configuration
is buried in the 
menus quite deeply. The path is: "Settings ->
Configure Project -> 
ProjectName". Also I think it's not perfectly intuitive
having the 
project-configuration under "Settings", because
for me settings usually means 
changing the behavior of KDevelop itself.

So I propose putting the project-information in a more
accessible place.

Possible locations:

"Project -> ProjectName ->
(Configure/Build)"

Another option would be just creating a top-level menu-item
for each open 
project, so it would look lik
"ProjectName -> Configure"

Of course there should be more project-options than just
"Configure", for 
example "Build", "Close", etc.

Personally I'd prefer the last option as long as there's
less then 4 projects 
open.

What do you people think about the problem?

Greetings, David

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

Re: Project Configuration
user name
2008-03-08 15:24:42
On 08.03.08 19:49:50, David Nolden wrote:
> While using kdevelop I've noticed that project
configuration is buried in the 
> menus quite deeply. The path is: "Settings ->
Configure Project -> 
> ProjectName". Also I think it's not perfectly
intuitive having the 
> project-configuration under "Settings",
because for me settings usually means 
> changing the behavior of KDevelop itself.

Well and I think its the complete opposite for newcomers.
Settings is
similar to configuration and thus I think newcomers will
search for
project configuration under Settings. Of course I can't back
that up
with any data and yes, having project options under Project
is also
completely sane.

> So I propose putting the project-information in a more
accessible place.
> 
> Possible locations:
> 
> "Project -> ProjectName ->
(Configure/Build)"

I'm not sure what you mean with
"(Configure/Build)" there, but I'm fine
with having Project -> Configure ->
<Projectnames>

I don't think having the project names directly in the
top-level menu is
a good idea, it simply doesn't fit with the rest.

Thinking about it a bit more, why is that in the menu at
all? It doesn't
make sense to have stuff like that in the menu. It should
simply be in
the context menu of the project manager. IMHO the menu
should only
contain actions that don't _need_ a selection in any part of
KDevelop
(though they might be able to work better with one). Thats
what other
IDE's do and I don't see a problem with that.

> Another option would be just creating a top-level
menu-item for each open 
> project, so it would look lik
> "ProjectName -> Configure"

Hell no, that won't scale for more than 2 or 3 projects, as
the menu bar
will grow wider than any screen.

> Of course there should be more project-options than
just "Configure", for 
> example "Build", "Close", etc.

Not even over my dead body ;) There's no sense to have that
there. Those
are all actions which need a selection and thus their proper
place is
either a menu inside the project manager or the context menu
of that
view.

Andreas

-- 
You look tired.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develkdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinf
o/kdevelop-devel

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )