hmmm

after reading the last few threads now I understand
why so many people are against releasing their code uner
an open source license ... because they know their code is 
ugly ...
Mathieu
PS. this is a sarcastic comment 
-- 
Ozman's Laws:
	(1) If someone says he will do something "without
fail," he
	    won't.
	(2) The more people talk on the phone, the less money they
	    make.
	(3) People who go to conferences are the ones who
shouldn't.
	(4) Pizza always burns the roof of your mouth.

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

On Wednesday 24 May 2006 21:08, Mathieu Chouinard wrote:
> after reading the last few threads now I understand
> why so many people are against releasing their code
uner
> an open source license ... because they know their code
is
> ugly ...
> Mathieu
> PS. this is a sarcastic comment 

Sorry, my comprehension of English is not sufficient for
this.
What do you mean here?

I for my side am very happy that Andras takes care about the
code quality. And 
I am always grateful if others do this for me with my code,
because I get an 
opportunity to learn and it prevents me from having my name
associated to bad 
code. 
But of course getting criticized hurts my ego and can create
unpleasant 
feelings. But IMHO this is the price for improving myself.

I think we need to uphold a certain standard of our
codebase. This can be done 
by preventing code from coming into the codebase that does
not meet our 
criteria. Or we can accept code and when we see the need to
talk about it we 
start a discussion. This is what I observed here. 

Jens
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel