branches/kdevelop/3.4

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 15:46, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:30, Amilcar do Carmo
Lucas wrote:
> >>Andras Mantia wrote:
> >>>On Sunday 28 May 2006 18:03, Amilcar do
Carmo Lucas wrote:
> >>>>---
branches/kdevelop/3.4/configure.in.in #545927:545928
> >>>> -1,6 +1,6 
> >>>>-#MIN_CONFIG(3.2.0)
> >>>>+#MIN_CONFIG(3.4.0)
> >>>
> >>>This is wrong. It require Qt 3.4.0 (which
does not exist) and not
> >>>KDE 3.4.0.
> >>
> >>Oooops, sorry! My error.
> >>
> >>Can someone correct it to 3.3 ?
> >
> > Done. But this also means what could try to
compile on KDE 3.3.x
> > (as there is no KDE version checking).
>
> Well, there where some attempts to fix KDE 3.3
compilation, but it
> has not been completed.
>
> So I guess we could add a KDE >= 3.4 check.

This is what I mean, a KDE >= 3.4 check must be included
manually.  
AFAIK there is no such check in the admin dir that we could
use.

Andras

PS: You are sending the mails only in private. 

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.o
rg
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

On 5/30/06, Andras Mantia <amantiakde.org> wrote:
> PS: You are sending the mails only in private. 

I keep doing this mistake too. "Reply" now
replies to the author, not
the mailinglist. Is this a mailinglist setting?

// jens

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

Andras Mantia wrote:

> This is what I mean, a KDE >= 3.4 check must be
included manually.  
> AFAIK there is no such check in the admin dir that we
could use.

Here is a start:

# --- Check for KDE 3.4 ---

AC_MSG_CHECKING([for KDE version])
AC_LANG_SAVE
AC_LANG_CPLUSPLUS
save_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
CXXFLAGS="$KDE_INCLUDES $QT_INCLUDES
$all_includes"

AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([
#include <kdeversion.h>
#if ! ( KDE_IS_VERSION( 3, 3, 90 ) )
#error KDE 3.4
#endif
],
        found kde 3.4
,
        KDE_choke me
)
CXXFLAGS="$save_CXXFLAGS"
AC_LANG_RESTORE

> PS: You are sending the mails only in private. 
I was wandering why it did not appear in the list! 

amilcar

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

On Tuesday, 30. May 2006 16:14, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> On 5/30/06, Andras Mantia <amantiakde.org> wrote:
> > PS: You are sending the mails only in private.

>
> I keep doing this mistake too. "Reply" now
replies to the author, not
> the mailinglist. Is this a mailinglist setting?

I don't think so.
The List-Id is still in each message, and my KMail still
properly fills in the 
mailing list address on replying. Must be some
misconfiguration on the client 
side.

Bye,
  Jakob

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> On 5/30/06, Andras Mantia <amantiakde.org> wrote:
>>PS: You are sending the mails only in private. 
> 
> I keep doing this mistake too. "Reply" now
replies to the author, not
> the mailinglist. Is this a mailinglist setting?
yes it is.

http:/
/www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml


Regards,
Amilcar

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 17:16, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([

I never used this, only AC_TRY_COMPILE and that is what is
used 
everywhere in KDE. Hm, it seems that that one is obsolete
and one 
should use AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, but I don't know in what
autoconf version 
it appeared.

Otherwise - without checking in real life - it looks OK.

Andras



-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.o
rg
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 09:05, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 15:46, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas
wrote:
> > Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:30, Amilcar do
Carmo Lucas wrote:
> > >>Andras Mantia wrote:
> > >>>On Sunday 28 May 2006 18:03, Amilcar
do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> > >>>>---
branches/kdevelop/3.4/configure.in.in #545927:545928
> > >>>> -1,6 +1,6 
> > >>>>-#MIN_CONFIG(3.2.0)
> > >>>>+#MIN_CONFIG(3.4.0)
> > >>>
> > >>>This is wrong. It require Qt 3.4.0
(which does not exist) and not
> > >>>KDE 3.4.0.
> > >>
> > >>Oooops, sorry! My error.
> > >>
> > >>Can someone correct it to 3.3 ?
> > >
> > > Done. But this also means what could try to
compile on KDE 3.3.x
> > > (as there is no KDE version checking).
> >
> > Well, there where some attempts to fix KDE 3.3
compilation, but it
> > has not been completed.
> >
> > So I guess we could add a KDE >= 3.4 check.
>
> This is what I mean, a KDE >= 3.4 check must be
included manually. 
> AFAIK there is no such check in the admin dir that we
could use.
>
> Andras
>
> PS: You are sending the mails only in private. 

This is easy, I will create one and email the list when
it's ready.
--
Matt

_______________________________________________
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-develbarney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/
kdevelop-devel