List Info

Thread: Re: KOffice status survey




Re: KOffice status survey
country flaguser name
Poland
2007-12-05 03:00:20
Inge Wallin said the following, On 2007-12-04 14:06:

> We were discussing the tagging of the next alpha
together with KDE 4.0RC2 on 
> IRC today, and the topic of the current status of
KOffice came up.  It turns 
> out that nobody really knows the full status, so we
decided to do a little 
> survey.
> 
> Would the maintainers of each component please reply to
this mail in the 
> mailing list and state here:
>  * which features that are still not implemented, but
which you want for 2.0?

* Turning KexiDB as Predicate library _out_ of KOffice
* putting CSV import/export back for reusing in kofficelibs

>  * which features that exist, but are still far from
usable?

Not ported in Kexi (and not using Qt4 improvements): Forms,
simple printing
Those alone can be treat as whole applications.

I imagine very long period before there's chance for any
freeze in Kexi 2.0.
The reason is as obvious as KDE 4 - we and particulary I,
need to split my 
time and give some chance for KDE 4 internals, especially
Windows port for the 
KDE framework and some strategic KDE applications other than
KOffice.

> You do *not* have to name every feature in the program,
and especially not 
> those that only have polishing left.

We know the main showstopper for any app would be the level
of support of 
underlying file format, to avoid data loss and users
frustration. I believe a 
failure here would be worse than delays in our situation.
For everyone it's ODF, except for Kexi which maintains its
own file format 
consisted of XML subformats (QT Desingner's), some custom
ones. Chunks of ODF 
are the matter of the future beyond 2.0 (e.g. embedding
whole ODT templates) - 
ODF provides nothing for database apps except connectivity
information for 
apps like word processors, and this is not especially bad
thing.

On top of that Kexi's storage model would improve by
migrating to the newest 
stable SQLite. This is not started and isn't a matter of
replacing a library - 
semi-automatic import/export features and/or conditions
backward compatibility 
have to developed.

Scripts, what is another whole big layer, can take
extensibility to the next 
level - we do not maintain the object model yet - one that
can stay solid for 
years allowing for backward compatibility. Scripts are
central part of Kexi, 
as it's more development tool than any other app.

Adam Pigg is implementing introductory stages for object
model in his much 
appreciated reporting module [1]. There is not much reuse,
largely because of 
we're short on manpower. Again, the reporting module is
something like a whole 
application.

To put more vivid thing at the end, we are going to have one
more driver in 
2.0, providing Sybase and MSSQL db support. This one comes
from a new, 
vigorous developer Sharan Rao, which I met at Akademy this
year.

[1] http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Kexi+Rep
ort+Part?content=58208

-- 
regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek
  Sponsored by OpenOffice Polska (http://www.openoffice
.com.pl/en) to work on
  Kexi & KOffice: http://www.kexi.pl/en, http://www.koffice.org
  KDE3 & KDE4 Libraries for MS Windows: http://kdelibs.com, http://www.kde.org
_______________________________________________
Kexi mailing list
Kexikde.org
https://ma
il.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kexi

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )