|
List Info
Thread: Re: L3VPN : CE Multihoming Question
|
|
| Re: L3VPN : CE Multihoming Question |

|
2007-04-05 22:21:56 |
|
But as per RFC 4364 section 4.3, it is the decision
process of protocol running between PE and CE
" At these other PEs, BGP will again choose
the best route for a particular VPN-IP4 address prefix.
Then the chosen VPN-IP4 routes are converted back into IP
routes, and "imported" into one or more VRFs. Whether they
are actually installed in the VRFs depends on the decision
process of the routing method used between the PE and those CEs
that are associated with the VRF in question. Finally, any route
installed in a VRF may be distributed to the associated CE
routers"
Regards,
Kalyan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:31
AM
Subject: RE: L3VPN : CE Multihoming
Question
Yes, BGP should compare these routes. Once RD is
stripped and route is candidate for import into a VRF, the
routes are
like any other BGP routes with attributes and should be
compared.
-Deven
Hi ,
I have question related to CE multihoming in the
following scenario
1. CE1 is multi homed to PE1 and PE2 and sends
the route 10.10.0.0/16 to both PE1 and PE2 2. PE1 select this route as best
route and send it to PE3 as VPNv4 with RD 1:1 and ERT 11:11 3. PE2 also
select this route as best route and send it to PE3 as VPNv4 with RD 2:2 and
ERT 22:22 4. PE3 has VRF1 connected to CE2 with IRT 11:11 and 22:22 and
OSPF is running between PE3 and CE2 5. Now PE3 receives the two VPNv4
routes for prefix 10.10.0.0./16 from two sources with two different
RD, Which route PE3 BGP will choose and download to VRF1
? 6. Should BGP compare these two routes even if they come with two
different RDs and download one route to VRF or download both
routes to VRF as they come with two different RDs ?
Regards, Kalyan |
[1]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|