List Info

Thread: Focus adjustment




Focus adjustment
user name
2006-01-28 01:32:51
I am using the glass mount and have not had any problems at all with
focus. In fact, I have found the point of focus to be very precise,
resulting in scans of great apparent sharpness even without any
unsharp mask. And I am simply focusing on the negative, not with a
special template.

Sounds like to me something could be wrong with the settings of your
Leaf?

Sandy


--- In Leafscan@yahoogroups.com, "msellers1" <msellers1s...> wrote:
&gt;
> John,
>; Thanks for your input.I am using the glass mount from Burney so
the film plane is higher than normal which seems to be throwing off
my focus point.
&gt; &nbsp; ----- Original Message -----
>&nbsp;  From: johnl002
>&nbsp;  To: Leafscan@yahoogroups.com
>&nbsp;  Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 11:24 AM
>&nbsp;  Subject: [Leafscan] Re: Focus adjustment
>
>
>&nbsp;  --- In Leafscan@yahoogroups.com, "leicamike2000&quot;
<msellers1s...> wrote:
&gt; &nbsp; >
>  ; > I am not satisfied with the sharpness of the focus when at
4.7.It
>&nbsp;  > seems soft.I can stop down to f8 but I am getting scan times
in the
>&nbsp;  > one hour range.Is there some way to adjust or re-calibrate the
focus
>&nbsp;  > point?
&gt; &nbsp; > Mike
>  ; >
>
>
>&nbsp;  Mike,
>;
>&nbsp;  I agree with others' comments about focus, optimal apertures,
post-scan
>&nbsp;  usm, etc.  My own tests show that stopping down also increases
the
>&nbsp;  resolution away from the image center, especially scanning 4x5's
in
>&nbsp;  landscape orientation.  It's better when scanning 4x5's in
portrait
>&nbsp;  orientation and smaller film sizes, but you have to put up with
the
>&nbsp;  longer scan times with the smaller apertures.
>
>&nbsp;  I've settled on F5.6 for 35mm, f8 for 2-1/4, and f11 for 4x5,
and yep,
>&nbsp;  rather long scan times are a result.&nbsp; But in my workflow, these
>&nbsp;  apertures provide a good compromise between resolution across
the image
>&nbsp;  and scan times.
&gt;
>&nbsp;  Also, depending on how much of the film area is to be used, I'll
also
>&nbsp;  employ a sort of vignetting mask to apply a little extra usm
away from
>&nbsp;  the image center to help compensate for that inherent lens
resolution
>&nbsp;  fall-off toward the image edges.
&gt;
>&nbsp;  My 2 cents....
>
>&nbsp;  John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>&nbsp;  Message Archives
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Leafscan/messages>
>
>&nbsp;  Helpful Documents
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Leafscan/files/>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>&nbsp;  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>&nbsp; &nbsp;  a..  Visit your group "Leafscan" on the web.
>  ; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>&nbsp; &nbsp;  b..  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>&nbsp;   ;  Leafscan-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>&nbsp;   ; &nbsp;
>&nbsp; &nbsp;  c..  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )