List Info

Thread: Re: Top Public Library Websites (Cross-Posted)




Re: Top Public Library Websites (Cross-Posted)
user name
2008-02-17 14:43:29
Hi - I think having a list of library websites is a great
resource, but I
have a couple of suggestions for improvement:

- You should alert users that the link will bring up a word
document rather
than a new page.  For example, use (DOC) after the title.

- It would be great to see the library websites in a table
or list form,
rather than a cut-and-paste from the email listservs.  Also,
some of the
libraries mentioned don't show a link to the websites! (I
thought that was
the whole point  )

- Hopefully you have already received permission from the
writers to post
their personal information on your document.  Many of those
replies
contained email addresses and physical addresses/contact
info.  I know some
of that that information gets posted to the web4lib archive,
thus is already
on the Internet, but I myself would still be wary of having
that information
up.

Good luck with this endeavor!

Caitlin Nelson
Assistant Librarian
TransPacific Hawaii College

On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 7:00 AM, <web4lib-requestwebjunction.org> wrote:

> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:25:14 +0000 (GMT)
> From: libconsultoptonline.net
> Subject: [Web4lib] Top Public Library Websites
(Cross-Posted)
> To: web4libwebjunction.org
> Message-ID: <e3ece6d741f9.47b7a91aoptonline.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Here is a link to a list of replies that I received for
Top Public Library
> Websites. If you wish to comment, please send replies
to the list.
> Many thanks to everyone who sent their suggestions and
thank you for your
> patience!
>
> http://myli
braryweb.com/mylibraryweb.aspx
>
> ~Marie Monteagudo
> libconsultoptonline.net
>
> mylibraryweb.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
Web4lib mailing list
Web4libwebjunction.org
http://lists.we
bjunction.org/web4lib/

Files on PUBLIB -- mea culpa
user name
2008-02-18 07:45:46
This is COMPLETELY my fault (Karen / PUBLIB here). I was
approving stuff
stuck in our queue and was irked with myself when I saw I
had approved a
Word attachment, which is like coughing into a salad and
bringing it to
a potluck. (In my defense, I knew the post was "too
large" but couldn't
tell why until I had posted it... but it was suspiciously
huge, which is
usually enough to warrant the kibosh from us.)

This list would have worked far better as a post or as a
link to a Wiki
or blog post or website page... more useful and accessible
(and far less
virus-prone). 

Finally (posting as Karen/Karen), I appreciate the effort
into this list
but I did notice that very little of the conclusions were
user-centric
or evidence-driven. I didn't see "stats went up"
or "users liked it" or
"it improved findability by x percent." I do
"get" the difference
between ugly and pretty, which is hard to quantify, but I
still felt
skeptical about the list as a whole.

Karen G. Schneider


On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:43:29 -1000, "Caitlin
Nelson"
<cnelsonhawaii.edu> said:
> Hi - I think having a list of library websites is a
great resource, but I
> have a couple of suggestions for improvement:
> 
> - You should alert users that the link will bring up a
word document
> rather
> than a new page.  For example, use (DOC) after the
title.
> 
> - It would be great to see the library websites in a
table or list form,
> rather than a cut-and-paste from the email listservs. 
Also, some of the
> libraries mentioned don't show a link to the websites!
(I thought that
> was
> the whole point  )
> 
> - Hopefully you have already received permission from
the writers to post
> their personal information on your document.  Many of
those replies
> contained email addresses and physical
addresses/contact info.  I know
> some
> of that that information gets posted to the web4lib
archive, thus is
> already
> on the Internet, but I myself would still be wary of
having that
> information
> up.
> 
> Good luck with this endeavor!
> 
> Caitlin Nelson
> Assistant Librarian
> TransPacific Hawaii College
> 
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 7:00 AM,
<web4lib-requestwebjunction.org> wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:25:14 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: libconsultoptonline.net
> > Subject: [Web4lib] Top Public Library Websites
(Cross-Posted)
> > To: web4libwebjunction.org
> > Message-ID: <e3ece6d741f9.47b7a91aoptonline.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Here is a link to a list of replies that I
received for Top Public Library
> > Websites. If you wish to comment, please send
replies to the list.
> > Many thanks to everyone who sent their suggestions
and thank you for your
> > patience!
> >
> > http://myli
braryweb.com/mylibraryweb.aspx
> >
> > ~Marie Monteagudo
> > libconsultoptonline.net
> >
> > mylibraryweb.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Web4lib mailing list
> Web4libwebjunction.org
> http://lists.we
bjunction.org/web4lib/
_______________________________________________
Web4lib mailing list
Web4libwebjunction.org
http://lists.we
bjunction.org/web4lib/

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )