Thanks Kevin, for the reply. It surprised me when I learned
that Windows servers take up half or more of the server OS
install base in large enterprises (I don't remember the
numbers
though) A native Windows lighttpd would be great for
a cross-platform solution.
Monday, October 22, 2007, 12:52:39 PM, you wrote:
> I do not maintain any Windows versions anymore. I have
stepped aside
> when the WLMP team started releasing their builds.
> I was running my windows build of lighttpd on my
website
> (https:www.kevinworthington.com/), until I stepped
aside. I now run my
> lighttpd linux rpms on a fedora linux server. My
windows build worked
> fine on my site, but it only gets a small amount of
traffic - about
> 2000-2500 hits/day, so YMMV.
> On 10/22/07, Jack L <jlist9 yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>> I tried the cygwin version of lighttpd a while ago.
It suffered
>> occasional crashes so I had to remove it from the
production server.
>> I'd like to know how things are now to see if I
should try it again -
>> I miss the lighty features! I'd appreciate it if
you can help answer
>> some of my questions:
>>
>> - A native Windows port was mentioned long ago. Is
it still on the
>> roadmap? The main reason I'm asking this is that
I had some problems
>> with PHP script calling ActiveX controls with the
cygwin build. Another
>> reason is that it'll be great to remove
dependency on the cygwin
>> dll, which has a big issue with versions, among
other things.
>>
>> - Is there anyone running cygwin build on
production servers? How
>> has it been?
>>
>> - Kevin Worthington and WLMP team are maintaining
two cygwin builds?
>> Is there an "official" cygwin port?
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Jack
>>
>>
|