List Info

Thread: Re: LDP Incorporate under "Software in the Public Interest"




Re: LDP Incorporate under "Software in the Public Interest"
user name
2007-11-04 10:12:05
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:33:00AM -0700, David Lawyer
wrote:
> 
> With the simple LinuxDoc available, encoding in DocBook
is not a high
> priority task IMO.  Translation is done by people in
non-English
> speaking countries so this is not a high priority task
either.  But
> volunteers are needed as authors and to help maintain
our website as
> well as for creating a content managment system (like
Plone) and also
> a wiki.  We also need better follow up for people who
propose to write
> howtos for us, etc.  Someone need to sort out old
howtos and determine
> which ones are too far out of date, etc.  We also need
recruiters and
> reviewers.  Thus we need volunteers to do
administrative tasks.
> 

Translation is at least as high priority as English
documentation. 
If you don't think so, then you're obviously from the
"world speaks 
English" camp. I'm in England - that can't even be
guaranteed for 40 
miles away in Wales 

> I think that before we accept people to help administer
LDP, they
> should have either written at least one good document,
either for LDP
> or elsewhere.  In order to help admisinister an
organization that
> has authors hopefully writing good quality
documentation, the
> administrators should at least be capable of doing the
same.
>  
> > I would like to hear more about what specific
advantages/costs would
> > be associated with joining SPI though.
> > 
> > Cheers, Ian Hakes DB2 for Linux Howto
> >                                                   
                        
> 
> >David Lawyer
> ><davelafn.org>
> >To discussen.tldp.org
> >10/31/2007 01:35 AM 
> >cc 
> >Subjectl [discuss] LDP Incorporate under
"Software in the Public Interest"
> 
> (I've deleted the "A" typo. DL)
> > Several months ago I started a discussion about
getting an EIN
> > number from the IRS but found that it wouldn't
help much.  Then the
> > discussion changed to possible incorporation of
LDP but nothing
> > happened.  So now I'm proposing that we become a
part of "Software
> > in the Public Interest" (SPI) if they will
accept us.  That way we
> > remain independent but are incorporated under the
umbrella
> > organization, SPI.
> > 

Good idea - it works for Debian and other projects.

Andy

> > 
> > I understand that the way it works is that we are
free to leave SPI
> > if we decide to.  Then we would no longer be
incorporated and would
> > probably want to incorporate on our own if we
found it advantageous
> > to be a corporation.  I'll need to look into how
SPI would handle
> > and invest our money.
> > 
> >                                       David
Lawyer
> > 

I'm sure that they'll advise - even if some people may
disagree, they 
are very open about their business.

AndyC


______________________
http://lists.tldp.org/


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )