List Info

Thread: Re: Add mapping table between irq and vector




Re: Add mapping table between irq and vector
country flaguser name
United States
2007-07-20 15:17:28
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:59:17 GMT
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernelvger.kernel.org> wrote:

> +	BUG_ON(bind_irq_vector(irq, vector));

It's not good practice to do
assert(expression-with-side-effects).  Because
if someone wants to create a build which has all the
assertions disabled,
the resulting binary will not work.

In the present implementation our BUG_ON(expression) will
evaluate
`expression' even if CONFIG_BUG=n.  But that's totally lame
and we are just
leaving optimisation opportunities on the floor.

Our objective _should_ be to make BUG_ON(expr) generate no
code at all if
CONFIG_BUG=n.

So please, prefer to do

	if (bind_irq_vector(irq, vector))
		BUG();

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
"unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomovger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vge
r.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Add mapping table between irq and vector
country flaguser name
United States
2007-07-20 15:21:38
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:17:28 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpmlinux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:59:17 GMT
> Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernelvger.kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > +	BUG_ON(bind_irq_vector(irq, vector));
> 
> It's not good practice to do
assert(expression-with-side-effects).  Because
> if someone wants to create a build which has all the
assertions disabled,
> the resulting binary will not work.
> 
> In the present implementation our BUG_ON(expression)
will evaluate
> `expression' even if CONFIG_BUG=n.  But that's totally
lame and we are just
> leaving optimisation opportunities on the floor.
> 
> Our objective _should_ be to make BUG_ON(expr) generate
no code at all if
> CONFIG_BUG=n.
> 
> So please, prefer to do
> 
> 	if (bind_irq_vector(irq, vector))
> 		BUG();
> 

hm, now I think about it, our present implementation seems
OK.  If you
have CONFIG_BUG=n then this:

	BUG_ON(foo < bar);

will generate no code and this:

	BUG_ON(some_function());

will still call some_function().

So I guess we're OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
"unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomovger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vge
r.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )