Am 2007-03-12 18:53, Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
> Oliver Falk schrieb:
>> Am 2007-03-11 12:21, Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
>>
>> I think this is something that should be discussed
on the next board
>> meeting; Shouldn't it? Someone from board on this
list?
>
> I think working out details like this is more for FESCo
(the whole
> secondary arch stuff is IMHO something more for FESCo
these days and not
> for the board, which handles it currently afaics and
should only drive
> the idea, not the details imho).
ack.
> Anyway, I think it's enough to keep in mind for now and
bring it up when
> the details of the secondary arch stuff is worked out
(or is somebody
> working on that already?).
First of all it must be clear if there's (or will be) enough
space
(storage) available. Technically I don't see any problem to
implement
secondary archs. Any other mind?
However, I'm not in the infrastructure group, nor in FESCo.
It's up to
you (FI/FESCo) now to bring up the ideas and solutions at
the right
point.  Of course,
I'm willing to help out wherever I can...
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
axp-list mailing list
axp-list redhat.com
http
s://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
|
