List Info

Thread: Re: The Common Lisp Directory finally crashed after 823 days.




Re: The Common Lisp Directory finally crashed after 823 days.
user name
2008-03-15 15:03:56
Wow! That's very cool Marc.

--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM





_______________________________________________
lispweb mailing list
lispwebred-bean.com
http
://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb

The Common Lisp Directory finally crashed after 823 days.
user name
2008-03-15 12:05:40
[Is this list still somewhat alive?]

The Common Lisp Directory (http://www.cl-user.net)
lisp process crashed
yesterday after 823 days of continuous service.
 
In these 2 years and 93 days, the same lisp process
(LispWorks on Linux
Debian) served 273M requests without any problem. Even the
crash was not
really lisp's fault as it was caused by a swap disk problem
which caused
the kernel to kill a lot of processes.
 
During these 823 days, I had to restart Apache every few
months and the
firewall router every several days. I also got several
electric power
outages but fortunately none longer than the 3h of UPS
battery time.
BTW this shows than Debian is also a stable platform for
this kind of
applications.
 
So the CLD lisp process uptime experiment is now over and I
will move
the CLD to a better place than a simple server in my
basement.
 
Marc



_______________________________________________
lispweb mailing list
lispwebred-bean.com
http
://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb

Re: The Common Lisp Directory finally crashed after 823 days.
user name
2008-03-15 15:19:06
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Marc Battyani
<marc.battyanifractalconcept.com> wrote:
> [Is this list still somewhat alive?]
>
>  The Common Lisp Directory (http://www.cl-user.net)
lisp process crashed
>  yesterday after 823 days of continuous service.
>
>  In these 2 years and 93 days, the same lisp process
(LispWorks on Linux
>  Debian) served 273M requests without any problem. Even
the crash was not
>  really lisp's fault as it was caused by a swap disk
problem which caused
>  the kernel to kill a lot of processes.
>
>  During these 823 days, I had to restart Apache every
few months and the
>  firewall router every several days. I also got several
electric power
>  outages but fortunately none longer than the 3h of UPS
battery time.
>  BTW this shows than Debian is also a stable platform
for this kind of
>  applications.
>
>  So the CLD lisp process uptime experiment is now over
and I will move
>  the CLD to a better place than a simple server in my
basement.
>
>  Marc
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  lispweb mailing list
>  lispwebred-bean.com
>  http
://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb
>

Well done!

A new record, I suspect.

As a matter of interest, does it use one of the standard
servers, or
did you roll your own?
Rob

-- 
Robert Synnott
http://myblog.rsynnott.com

MSN: rsynnottgmail.com
Jabber: rsynnottgmail.com

_______________________________________________
lispweb mailing list
lispwebred-bean.com
http
://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb

Re: The Common Lisp Directory finally crashed after 823 days.
user name
2008-03-15 17:19:03
Robert Synnott wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Marc Battyani
> <marc.battyanifractalconcept.com> wrote:
>   
>> [Is this list still somewhat alive?]
>>
>>  The Common Lisp Directory (http://www.cl-user.net)
lisp process crashed
>>  yesterday after 823 days of continuous service.
>>
>>  In these 2 years and 93 days, the same lisp
process (LispWorks on Linux
>>  Debian) served 273M requests without any problem.
Even the crash was not
>>  really lisp's fault as it was caused by a swap
disk problem which caused
>>  the kernel to kill a lot of processes.
>>
>>  During these 823 days, I had to restart Apache
every few months and the
>>  firewall router every several days. I also got
several electric power
>>  outages but fortunately none longer than the 3h of
UPS battery time.
>>  BTW this shows than Debian is also a stable
platform for this kind of
>>  applications.
>>
>>  So the CLD lisp process uptime experiment is now
over and I will move
>>  the CLD to a better place than a simple server in
my basement.
>>
>>  Marc
>>     
> Well done!
>
> A new record, I suspect.
>
> As a matter of interest, does it use one of the
standard servers, or
> did you roll your own
I use my own webapp server with Apache and mod_lisp:
.http://www.fractalconcept.com/ilc2002-marc-battyani.pdf
 
Now it would be called an Ajax framework but I don"t
even know if the
acronym already existed in 2000/2002.

Marc



_______________________________________________
lispweb mailing list
lispwebred-bean.com
http
://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb

[1-4]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )