List Info

Thread: OpenBSD STABLE ports are no longer maintained




OpenBSD STABLE ports are no longer maintained
user name
2008-01-11 16:38:50
Hi All:

 I need advice. The OpenBSD STABLE ports tree is no longer
maintained. See:

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119347390
302171&w=1

What should I do about needed packages? Should I just fetch
the
individual tarballs? Any ideas?

-- 
Kind regards,
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
ColoBSD-talk mailing list
ColoBSD-talklists.nycbug.org
http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/colobsd-talk

Re: OpenBSD STABLE ports are no longer maintained
user name
2008-01-12 11:55:08
Jon, you should be able switch to the CURRENT OpenBSD ports
tree.  That 
probably just means that there will be slightly more risk of
a broken 
port, since you'll be using the "cutting edge"
ports.  If you use CVS to 
update your ports tree you would just need to use "cvs
up -A" next time 
you do "cvs up" to get the CURRENT ports instead
of the STABLE ports.

On the other hand, you could also continue to use STABLE
ports, it's 
just that you would never see any change from now (no ports
will be 
updated to newer versions etc).  I don't think the existing
ports and 
packages already there for STABLE will be "going
away", they just won't 
be updated.

Jon Drews wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
>  I need advice. The OpenBSD STABLE ports tree is no
longer maintained. See:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119347390
302171&w=1
> 
> What should I do about needed packages? Should I just
fetch the
> individual tarballs? Any ideas?
> 
_______________________________________________
ColoBSD-talk mailing list
ColoBSD-talklists.nycbug.org
http://lists.nycbug.org/mailman/listinfo/colobsd-talk

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )