*SpanNearQuery<file:///C:/lucene-2.1.0/docs/api/org/apach
e/lucene/search/spans/SpanNearQuery.html#SpanNearQuery%28org
.apache.lucene.search.spans.SpanQuery%5B%5D,%20int,%20boolea
n%29>
*(SpanQuery<file:///C:/lucene-2.1.0/docs/api/org/apache/l
ucene/search/spans/SpanQuery.html>[]
clauses,
int slop, boolean inOrder)
Erick
On 7/30/07, Joe Attardi <jattardi gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What about the case where I want to search a MAC
address? For example,
> 00:14:da:81:21:4f will be split by the
StandardTokenizer as the tokens
> "00", "14", "da",
"81", "21", and "4f".
>
> Suppose I want to search for 00:14:da:81:21:4f. In the
search box, I type
> 00:14:da:81:21:4f. But because these are all separate
tokens, it would
> still
> find a match if it had all the tokens but in a
different order - for
> example, that query would also find a MAC of
da:14:4f:21:00:81. Is there
> some way to enforce the order in which terms appear, or
should I just
> index
> a MAC address as UN_TOKENIZED ?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Joe Attardi
> jattardi gmail.com
> http://thinksincode
.blogspot.com/
>
> On 7/30/07, Ard Schrijvers <a.schrijvers hippo.nl> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > So then would I just concatenate the tokens
together to form
> > > the query text?
> >
> > You might better create a TermQuery for each token
instead of
> > concatenating, and combine them in a BooleanQuery
and say wether all
> terms
> > must or should occur. Very simple, see [1]
> >
> > Regards Ard
> >
> > [1]
> >
>
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightl
y/javadoc/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.html
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Joe Attardi
> > > jattardi gmail.com
> > > http://thinksincode
.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > On 7/30/07, Erick Erickson
<erickerickson gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Would this work?
> > > >
> > > > TokenStream ts =
StandardAnalyzer.tokenStream();
> > > > while ((Token tok = ts.next()) != null)
{
> > > > do whatever
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Erick
> > > >
> > > > On 7/30/07, Joe Attardi <jattardi gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Following up on my recent question.
It has been suggested
> > > to me that I
> > > > can
> > > > > run the query text through an
Analyzer without using the
> > > QueryParser.
> > > > For
> > > > > example, if I know what field to be
searched I can create
> > > a PrefixQuery
> > > > or
> > > > > WildcardQuery, but still want to
process the search text
> > > with the same
> > > > > Analyzer that did the indexing. How
do I run a query
> > > through an Analyzer
> > > > > without using the QueryParser... is
this possible?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
java-user-help lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
>
|