By design, it's not very efficient to ask for a large number
of
results with solr/lucene. I think you will face performance
and memory
problems if you do that.
On 9/24/07, Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.scherler.ext juntadeandalucia.es> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj
wrote:
> > > Hi Roopesh,
> >
> > > I am not sure whether I understand your
problem.
> >
> > > Is it the limitation of rows/pagination?
> > > If so why not using a real high number (like
rows=10000000000)?
> >
> > > salu2
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Assigning a high number will solve my problem. (I
thought that there will something like rows='all' to do
it).
> >
> > Can I do pagination using the python client?
>
> I am not a python expert but I think so.
>
> > How can I specify the starting position, offset
etc for
> > pagination through the python client?
>
> htt
p://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters
>
> It should work as described in the above document (with
the start
> parameter.
>
> e.g.
> data = c.search(q='query', fl='id score unique_id
Message-ID To From
> Subject',rows=50, wt='python',start=50)
>
> HTH
> --
> Thorsten Scherler
thorsten.at.apache.org
> Open Source Java consulting,
training and solutions
>
>
--
Jerome Eteve.
jerome eteve.net
http://jerome.eteve.free
.fr/
|