Chuck Houpt wrote:
> Thanks for the example, the restrictions on PRE are
annoying.
>
I think they have a deep historical background. Basically
PRE pre-dates
IMG which pre-dates image replacement (of text).
In the original HTML concept, images would either be first
class
resources, accessed through A elements, or part of documents
in non-HTML
formats (HTML was for rich navigation and cataloguing).
Mosaic added
IMG as a special link that embeds the image in graphical
browsers, but
they probably didn't consider allowing it in PRE because
image sizes
cannot be relied on to correlate with text sizes and they
hadn't thought
of image replacement.
I think there is still a problem with using IMG in PRE, as
you cannot
rely on the exact text size, so the pre-formatting can be
broken by an
image. (More generally, with image replacement, the user
has the right
to override your text size and image replacement doesn't
handle that
well. I regularly do this on graphical browsers, because
designers
think unreadably small text is cool.)
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses
may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a
world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may
not work.
_______________________________________________
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev nongnu.org
htt
p://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
|