Adam Lanier wrote:
> I believe Lotus adopted (many years ago) the
nomenclature
> 'superior/subordinate' but 'parent/child' or
'process/sub-process' would
> be reasonably appropriate in this context.
I prefer accuracy over appropriateness. parent/child and
process/subprocess
do not really describe what is going on.
superior/subordinate is closer, but
still not precise. Sorry, I'm not fond of political
correctness...
Regards,
David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in
the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org
a> and http://www.roaringpengu
in.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mime
defang
|