Re: Socket paths

Richard Laager wrote:

[David Skoll]
>> Because the sockets need to be in a directory
that's writable by the
>> "defang" user.

> Why's that? Couldn't the socket itself be writable by
the defang user...
> or does the daemon need to unlink() it?

The daemon needs to create the socket.  It's running as
"defang" at that
point.

Regards,

David.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in
the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpengu
in.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefanglists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mime
defang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mimedefang-bounceslists.roaringpenguin.com 
> [mailto:mimedefang-bounceslists.roaringpenguin.com]
On 
> Behalf Of David F. Skoll
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:12 AM
> To: mimedefanglists.roaringpenguin.com
> Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Socket paths
> 

While on the subject of socket paths, does it make any
performance difference if
the socket is placed in a ramdisk mount?


Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
jasonelectronet.net
ElectroNet Intermedia Consulting
3411 Capital Medical Blvd.
Tallahassee, FL 32308
(V) 850.222.0229 (F) 850.222.8771 

_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in
the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpengu
in.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefanglists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mime
defang