draft-xia-fmip--multicast-00 comments

Dear all,

there was also the suggestion of just adding multicast data
forwarding 
to FMIPv6 ... this seems to be a reasonable compromise, as
it also 
accounts for supporting multicast in access networks without
mcast 
routing support.

We actually would like to complement this by proposing an
equivalent 
support to HMIPv6. Based on our previous draft 
draft-schmidt-waehlisch-mhmipv6-04.txt we could submit a
corresponding 
proposal.

Regards,

thomas

Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Dear all,
>   Some people suggested transferring QoS context and
possibly other 
> state as well. As far as I know QoS context transfer
issue had been 
> brought app. five years ago, no activitity ever since.
One possible 
> reason is that QoS context transfer is better handled
in Layer 2. In 
> fact all cellular systems handle this, with specific
standards.
>   If there is desire to revive it, I suggest bringing
it with a draft, 
> then we can discuss?
> 
>   Regarding the comment that the use of a context
transfer protocol 
> would be better, I disagree,consider  the complexity of
adding CxTP to 
> FMIPv6.
> 
>  
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mipshop mailing list
> Mipshopietf.org
> https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop