Hello folks,
we updated draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba according to the
comments and
suggestions that Eric Gray posted on the IETF Discussion
mailing list
during IETF Last Call. Here is a change log (not including
purely
editorial items):
o Reference to RFC 3972 ("Cryptographically
Generated Addresses") is
now normative.
o More detailed IANA considerations.
o Fixed reference to BCP 14, RFC 2119, so that Nit
Checker does no
longer complain.
o Clarified in Section 3.1 that CGAs do not require a
public-key
infrastructure, even though they make use of
public-key
cryptography.
o Included intended status ("Proposed
Standard") at beginning of
document.
You can access the revised draft version as well as a diff
against the
previous version 02 at:
http://doc.tm.uka.de/2007/draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-
03.txt
http://doc.tm.uka.de/2007/draft-ietf-mipshop-cga
-cba-02to03.html
Best regards,
- Christian
--
Christian Vogt, Institute of Telematics, Universitaet
Karlsruhe (TH)
www.tm.uka.de/~chvogt/pubkey/
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop ietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
|