Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps

Alper Yegin wrote:
> Vijay,
> 
> If not mandated, it is at least a recommended practice
not to overlap a LC
> with the IETF week. Could you please move the call to
after the IETF week?

Why is that? In fact I see that folks are more active
around
the IETF meeting week, read more documents and send in more
comments. 

Vijay

> 
> Alper
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vijay Devarapalli
[mailto:vijay.devarapalliazairenet.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 3:03 AM
>> To: mipshopietf.org
>> Subject: [Mipshop] WG last call on
draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a two week working group last call for
>> draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps-00.txt. You can find the
>> document at the following URL.
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ie
tf-mipshop-mis-ps-00.txt
>>
>> The last call expires on March 26 2007.
>>
>> Please post any issues or comments on this document
to
>> the MIPSHOP WG mailing list. In case you have
reviewed
>> the document and found no issues, please send an
email
>> saying you support advancing this document.
>>
>> The intended status for this document is
Informational.
>>
>> Vijay
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mipshop mailing list
>> Mipshopietf.org
>> https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
> 


_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

I think it is right that people are tuning into the IETF
matters the weeks
before IETF. But the other fact is that, people go to IETF
for attending
official and unofficial meetings, do face-to-face
discussions. Not to sit by
themselves and read full documents and write down comments.


I have heard this from ADs enough many times. But I don't
know if this is
written anywhere. 

Alper



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vijay Devarapalli [mailto:vijay.devarapalliazairenet.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 1:29 AM
> To: Alper Yegin
> Cc: mipshopietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Mipshop] WG last call on
draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps
> 
> Alper Yegin wrote:
> > Vijay,
> >
> > If not mandated, it is at least a recommended
practice not to overlap a
> LC
> > with the IETF week. Could you please move the call
to after the IETF
> week?
> 
> Why is that? In fact I see that folks are more active
around
> the IETF meeting week, read more documents and send in
more
> comments. 
> 
> Vijay
> 
> >
> > Alper
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vijay Devarapalli
[mailto:vijay.devarapalliazairenet.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 3:03 AM
> >> To: mipshopietf.org
> >> Subject: [Mipshop] WG last call on
draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This is a two week working group last call
for
> >> draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps-00.txt. You can find
the
> >> document at the following URL.
> >>
> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ie
tf-mipshop-mis-ps-00.txt
> >>
> >> The last call expires on March 26 2007.
> >>
> >> Please post any issues or comments on this
document to
> >> the MIPSHOP WG mailing list. In case you have
reviewed
> >> the document and found no issues, please send
an email
> >> saying you support advancing this document.
> >>
> >> The intended status for this document is
Informational.
> >>
> >> Vijay
> >>
> >>
_______________________________________________
> >> Mipshop mailing list
> >> Mipshopietf.org
> >> https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
> >



_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop