RE: WG last call on draft-ietf-mipshop-mis-ps

> This last call is on a problem statement document. The
> document provides a problem definition, deployment
scenarios
> and the required solution components. It does not tie
us
> to a particular solution.


Why would a so-called "problem statement" document
ever talk about "solution
components"?




_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

Alper Yegin wrote:
>> This last call is on a problem statement document.
The
>> document provides a problem definition, deployment
scenarios
>> and the required solution components. It does not
tie us
>> to a particular solution.
> 
> 
> Why would a so-called "problem statement"
document ever talk about "solution
> components"?

I was talking about what is there in the document
currently.
There is no particular format for a problem statement. It
is for the working group to decide what goes into it.

Folks, please review the document and if you have any
comments, please post them to the mailing list. If you have
specific suggestions for text changes, it will help.

Vijay

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

Sorry if I am digressing from the core. But I am still
confused why
solution components and relevant framework are included in
this
document. To me, these parts are not ready to be moved
forward. Ok, I
will wait for DT's presentation in Prague, and get back to
the list
with more technical comments.

Daniel

On 3/13/07, Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalliazairenet.com> wrote:
> Alper Yegin wrote:
> >> This last call is on a problem statement
document. The
> >> document provides a problem definition,
deployment scenarios
> >> and the required solution components. It does
not tie us
> >> to a particular solution.
> >
> >
> > Why would a so-called "problem
statement" document ever talk about "solution
> > components"?
>
> I was talking about what is there in the document
currently.
> There is no particular format for a problem statement.
It
> is for the working group to decide what goes into it.
>
> Folks, please review the document and if you have any
> comments, please post them to the mailing list. If you
have
> specific suggestions for text changes, it will help.
>
> Vijay
>


-- 


Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop