RFC4068bis

Folks,

Please let me know if you have any comments on the recently
revised version,
especially about the BADF option and deprecating FNA.

Thanks,

-Rajeev




_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

Hi,

I have few doubts.

In reactive mode, without confirming the NCOA, how can an MN
send a FBU
immediately after UNA.

Lets consider the scenario. 
Some node is already using the NCOA on NAR's link. MN
attaches to NAR
and sends a UNA and then an FBU. Now when PAR receives this
FBU with
that NCOA, it will send FBACK and the buffer packets to that
NCOA, (by
skipping HI/HACk procedure, as mentioned in Bis section
6.3.2). If so,
the other node with that NCOA will be flooded with the
packets and the
actual MN will lose the packets.

I think, MN should send FBU only after confirming NCOA on
the NAR's
link, as it was implemented in 4068 in the from of
FNA[FBU].

Thanks & Regards,
Mohan

-----Original Message-----
From: Rajeev Koodli [mailto:rajeev.koodlinokia.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 4:07 PM
To: mipshopietf.org
Subject: [Mipshop] RFC4068bis


Folks,

Please let me know if you have any comments on the recently
revised
version,
especially about the BADF option and deprecating FNA.

Thanks,

-Rajeev




_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop