See RFC 4429.
jak
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kandra Mohan-a22098" <mohanbabu motorola.com>
To: <mipshopietf.org>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:22 AM
Subject: RE: [Mipshop] RFC4068bis
Hi,
I have few doubts.
In reactive mode, without confirming the NCOA, how can an MN
send a FBU
immediately after UNA.
Lets consider the scenario.
Some node is already using the NCOA on NAR's link. MN
attaches to NAR
and sends a UNA and then an FBU. Now when PAR receives this
FBU with
that NCOA, it will send FBACK and the buffer packets to that
NCOA, (by
skipping HI/HACk procedure, as mentioned in Bis section
6.3.2). If so,
the other node with that NCOA will be flooded with the
packets and the
actual MN will lose the packets.
I think, MN should send FBU only after confirming NCOA on
the NAR's
link, as it was implemented in 4068 in the from of
FNA[FBU].
Thanks & Regards,
Mohan
-----Original Message-----
From: Rajeev Koodli [mailto:rajeev.koodlinokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 4:07 PM
To: mipshopietf.org
Subject: [Mipshop] RFC4068bis
Folks,
Please let me know if you have any comments on the recently
revised
version,
especially about the BADF option and deprecating FNA.
Thanks,
-Rajeev
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
|
