Gauging interest in official WG adoption of internetdrafts

I support making those drafts as WG drafts.


On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, gabriel montenegro wrote:

> Folks,
>
> In today's meeting we talked about 4 potential items
up for adoption 
> as official working groups. Talking with folks after
the meeting, 
> we've decided to add two more to the list of items
we'll ask the WG 
> whether we should adopt. This is the follow-up email to
today's 
> discussion, to make sure we ask this on the mailing
list.
>
> So the question to the WG is: Should we adopt the
following documents 
> as official WG items (based on the individual drafts as
noted below)?:
>
> 1. draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rev-XX.txt
> based on draft-koodli-mipshop-rfc4068bis-00.txt
>
> 2. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt
> based on  draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt
>
> 3. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt
> based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt
(currently expired)
>
> 4. draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-XX.txt
> based on draft-jang-mipshop-fh80216e-02.txt
>
> 5. draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-XX.txt
> based on draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02.txt
>
> 6. draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt
> based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt
>
> Please send comments one way or another through April
4, 2006.
>
> Thanks,
>
> chairs
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mipshop mailing list
> Mipshopietf.org https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop


_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop