Gauging interest in official WG adoptionofinternetdrafts

I guess I have a hard time seeing that there's a problem
when the signaling 
is shared with the basic IP level movement detection. Sure,
if IP level 
movement detection isn't required, then it does require
some extra 
signaling. So I suppose we need to agree to disagree on this
one.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Soliman, Hesham" <hsolimanqualcomm.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempfdocomolabs-usa.com>; "Wassim Haddad" 
<whaddadtcs.hut.fi>; "gabriel montenegro" 
<gabriel_montenegro_2000yahoo.com>
Cc: <mipshopietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG 
adoptionofinternetdrafts


Sure, this *can* waste time during a handover, which the
point behind
having CT.
It depends on the handover scenario of course, so it's best
to avoid it.


Hesham

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempfdocomolabs-usa.com]
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:18 PM
 > To: Soliman, Hesham; Wassim Haddad; gabriel montenegro
 > Cc: mipshopietf.org
 > Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG
 > adoptionofinternetdrafts
 >
 > So is there a problem?
 >
 >         jak
 >
 > ----- Original Message ----- 
 > From: "Soliman, Hesham" <hsolimanqualcomm.com>
 > To: "James Kempf" <kempfdocomolabs-usa.com>; "Wassim Haddad"
 > <whaddadtcs.hut.fi>; "gabriel
montenegro"
 > <gabriel_montenegro_2000yahoo.com>
 > Cc: <mipshopietf.org>
 > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:36 PM
 > Subject: RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG
 > adoptionofinternetdrafts
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >  > => Well, the key distribution would need to
be repeated
 >  > every time you
 >  > move unless you CT keys right?
 >  >
 >  > jak>> The protocol is set up so that the
key provisioning
 >  > takes place as a
 >  > side effect of the RS/RA that the MN and AR need
to exchange
 >  > anyway for
 >  > movement detection. So there is no separate
signaling for
 >  > key provisioning.
 >
 > => So the protocol is repeated every time you move.
I didn't say
 > it had to be a new message format, I was commenting on
the
 > repetition.
 >
 > Hesham
 >
 >  >
 >  >             jak
 >  >
 >  >
 >  >
 >
 >
 >



_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshopietf.org
https:
//www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop