|
List Info
Thread: How many processes & no responce on telnet port 25
|
|
| How many processes & no responce on
telnet port 25 |

|
2006-12-21 17:38:09 |
>This what you are looking for?
>
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04)
mail_via_smtp: 250 2.6.0
>Ok, id=23146-04, from MTA: 250 Ok: queued as 699B4103E37
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04)
Passed SPAM,
>[85.98.19.99] [66.25.76.62] <nugf ptymobile.com> ->
><bonechip mslegacy.com>,
>Message-ID: <458AA2E8.9010602 cmnijbw.bcvcqr.r.mrcx.com>, Hits: 7.146,
>36826
>ms
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 postfix/qmgr[22924]:
699B4103E37:
>from=<nugf ptymobile.com>, size=18291, nrcpt=1
(queue active)
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04) Maia:
[disconnect]
>Disconnecting from SQL database
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04)
TIMING [total 36856 ms]
>-
>SMTP EHLO: 4 (0%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 1 (0%), lookup_sql: 4
(0%), SMTP
>pre-DATA-flush: 3 (0%), SMTP DATA: 73 (0%), body_hash: 1
(0%),
>maia_connect:
>4 (0%), maia_read_system_config: 4 (0%),
maia_get_mysql_size_limit: 2 (0%),
>lookup_sql: 2 (0%), mime_decode: 24 (0%),
get-file-type2: 17 (0%),
>parts_decode: 1 (0%), AV-scan-1: 22 (0%), lookup_sql: 3
(0%), lookup_sql: 2
>(0%), spam-wb-list: 1 (0%), SA msg read: 2 (0%), SA
parse: 4 (0%), SA
>check:
>35911 (97%), update_cache: 2 (0%), maia_store_mail: 65
(0%),
>deal_with_mail_size: 26 (0%), maia_record_tests: 264
(1%),
>maia_set_mail_status: 56 (0%), fwd-connect: 50 (0%),
fwd-mail-from: 2 (0%),
>fwd-rcpt-to: 37 (0%), write-header: 2 (0%), fwd-data: 1
(0%), fwd-data-end:
>213 (1%), fwd-rundown: 13 (0%), main_log_entry: 13 (0%),
update_snmp: 1
>(0%), maia_cleanup: 26 (0%), maia_disconnect: 0 (0%),
unlink-2-files: 1
>(0%), rundown: 0 (0%)
Yes. Everything looks good here, but SpamAssassin takes
forever. This could
simply be because the system is busy (and spamassassin is
very CPU
intensive) but whatever the reason, this is what I would
focus on. If you
decrease the amount of time SA spends, you get mail through
your machine
faster (you raise the speed limit so cars enter and exit the
freeway at a
faster pace).
SA check: 35911 (97%)
It took SpamAssassin 36 seconds to scan this message.
I would copy an email.txt file from one of the amavis temp
directories so
you have a sample mail. Then I would start to debug it.
su vscan -c 'spamassassin -D < email.txt 2>&1 |
less'
You can limit output to certain 'channels' (like dns) by
listing a channel:
su vscan -c 'spamassassin -D dns < email.txt 2>&1
| less'
If you are running Pyzor (the doc has it disabled, which is
Ok), I would use
the pyzor mirror instead of the default pyzor server. You
would find the
/.pyzor/servers file in the amavis home directory and change
it. This could
save you 5 seconds per message. For example:
echo "82.94.255.100:24441" >
/var/amavis/.pyzor/servers
Look for timeouts and other obvious errors. "fixed
relative path:" is not an
error.
Gary V
____________________________________________________________
_____
Experience the magic of the holidays. Talk to Santa on
Messenger.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msn
nkwme0080000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://imagine-windowsliv
e.com/minisites/santabot/default.aspx?locale=en-us
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-users renaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
|
|
| How many processes & no responce on
telnet port 25 |

|
2006-12-21 18:49:12 |
I will pull and email at check for SA problems.
I know that the server is busy, it runs at about 50% or more
cpu during
business hours. In addition the server currently has a
single SATA hd which
is probably causing a bottleneck at this load level. I
understand the
faster in, faster out. But would this cause my smtp/telnet
timeouts? Isn't
postfix designed to accept the connection and cache the
email until SA is
ready for it, if there are available smtp channels?
Thanks again for the help!
Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: maia-users-bounces renaissoft.com
[mailto:maia-users-bounces renaissoft.com] On Behalf
Of Gary V
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:38 AM
To: maia-users renaissoft.com
Subject: Re: [Maia-users] How many processes & no
responce on telnet port 25
>This what you are looking for?
>
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04)
mail_via_smtp: 250 2.6.0
>Ok, id=23146-04, from MTA: 250 Ok: queued as 699B4103E37
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04)
Passed SPAM,
>[85.98.19.99] [66.25.76.62] <nugf ptymobile.com> ->
><bonechip mslegacy.com>,
>Message-ID: <458AA2E8.9010602 cmnijbw.bcvcqr.r.mrcx.com>, Hits: 7.146,
>36826
>ms
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 postfix/qmgr[22924]:
699B4103E37:
>from=<nugf ptymobile.com>, size=18291, nrcpt=1
(queue active)
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04) Maia:
[disconnect]
>Disconnecting from SQL database
>Dec 21 09:08:39 gateway1 amavis[23146]: (23146-04)
TIMING [total 36856 ms]
>-
>SMTP EHLO: 4 (0%), SMTP pre-MAIL: 1 (0%), lookup_sql: 4
(0%), SMTP
>pre-DATA-flush: 3 (0%), SMTP DATA: 73 (0%), body_hash: 1
(0%),
>maia_connect:
>4 (0%), maia_read_system_config: 4 (0%),
maia_get_mysql_size_limit: 2 (0%),
>lookup_sql: 2 (0%), mime_decode: 24 (0%),
get-file-type2: 17 (0%),
>parts_decode: 1 (0%), AV-scan-1: 22 (0%), lookup_sql: 3
(0%), lookup_sql: 2
>(0%), spam-wb-list: 1 (0%), SA msg read: 2 (0%), SA
parse: 4 (0%), SA
>check:
>35911 (97%), update_cache: 2 (0%), maia_store_mail: 65
(0%),
>deal_with_mail_size: 26 (0%), maia_record_tests: 264
(1%),
>maia_set_mail_status: 56 (0%), fwd-connect: 50 (0%),
fwd-mail-from: 2 (0%),
>fwd-rcpt-to: 37 (0%), write-header: 2 (0%), fwd-data: 1
(0%), fwd-data-end:
>213 (1%), fwd-rundown: 13 (0%), main_log_entry: 13 (0%),
update_snmp: 1
>(0%), maia_cleanup: 26 (0%), maia_disconnect: 0 (0%),
unlink-2-files: 1
>(0%), rundown: 0 (0%)
Yes. Everything looks good here, but SpamAssassin takes
forever. This could
simply be because the system is busy (and spamassassin is
very CPU
intensive) but whatever the reason, this is what I would
focus on. If you
decrease the amount of time SA spends, you get mail through
your machine
faster (you raise the speed limit so cars enter and exit the
freeway at a
faster pace).
SA check: 35911 (97%)
It took SpamAssassin 36 seconds to scan this message.
I would copy an email.txt file from one of the amavis temp
directories so
you have a sample mail. Then I would start to debug it.
su vscan -c 'spamassassin -D < email.txt 2>&1 |
less'
You can limit output to certain 'channels' (like dns) by
listing a channel:
su vscan -c 'spamassassin -D dns < email.txt 2>&1
| less'
If you are running Pyzor (the doc has it disabled, which is
Ok), I would use
the pyzor mirror instead of the default pyzor server. You
would find the
/.pyzor/servers file in the amavis home directory and change
it. This could
save you 5 seconds per message. For example:
echo "82.94.255.100:24441" >
/var/amavis/.pyzor/servers
Look for timeouts and other obvious errors. "fixed
relative path:" is not an
error.
Gary V
____________________________________________________________
_____
Experience the magic of the holidays. Talk to Santa on
Messenger.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme
0080000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://ima
gine-windowslive.com/minisites/santabot/default.aspx?locale=
en-us
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-users renaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-users renaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
|
|
[1-2]
|
|