update:
taking a message that scored 1.3 as per the ham cache and
running it
through spamassassin -t it got scored as 13.7.
This is what maia reports as the score:
1.765 MARKETING_PARTNERS Claims you registered with a
partner
0.966 NO_OBLIGATION There is no obligation
0.113 HTML_90_100 Message is 90% to 100% HTML
0.001 HTML_MESSAGE HTML included in message
-2.599 BAYES_00 Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
And this is what Spamassassin -t reports as the score
1.8 MARKETING_PARTNERS BODY: Claims you registered with
a partner
1.0 NO_OBLIGATION BODY: There is no
obligation
0.1 HTML_90_100 BODY: Message is 90%
to 100% HTML
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in
message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian
spam
probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL
listed in the
URIBL blacklist
[URIs:
trade-in-value.com selectiveresorts.com]
2.1 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in
the WS
SURBL blocklist
[URIs:
trade-in-value.com]
3.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in
the OB
SURBL blocklist
[URIs:
selectiveresorts.com]
The 2 differences is the Bayes reporting and the URIBL, I
manually ran
the message 15minutes after it was received and did not do
any
additional training to the bayes. This morning I ran
sa-update and
load-sa-rules.pl and everything is synched or so it reports.
Anythoughts as to why the difference?
munroe wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out why various emails are
getting through SA
> and in doing so I have had to copy the "raw
html" and pass it in by hand
> to spamassassin, in doing so I have seen problems with
wrapping of the
> headers causing SA to not score it properly (by hand)
is there any way
> to get the real html without wrapping?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maia-users mailing list
> Maia-users renaissoft.com
> http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-users renaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
|