Hi,
> Correct--it's the way Maia lets you report false
positives for
> learning purposes, and to confirm that SpamAssassin's
guesses are
> correct. Even if you select "Labeled" as
your spam destiny, you will
> still see the items classified as spam in your spam
cache (note that
> in this case it's a "cache" rather than a
"quarantine", because the
> mail is not blocked, it's just a cached copy). This
is identical to
> the way the non-spam cache works--the mail is still
delivered as
> expected, but a copy is retained for Bayes training
and spam
> reporting purposes.
OK, I understand that now and I think that is a great way to
go for
training the system with the spams received.
The problem I can see with this method is a 'good' mail was
caught and
labelled as spam as well. When I select Non-Spam for that
mail then it
gets sent *AGAIN* to the user's mailbox even though they
have already
received it earlier. They now have a second copy of the
mail.
Perhaps if the configuration is setup to label spams rather
than
quarantine you shouldn't send the mail on to the user but
just passing
it to SA for learning as a good mail?
--
Regards,
Peter Kiem
Zordah IT - IT Consultancy and Internet Services
Ph: (0414) 724-766 Fax: (07) 3344-5827
Web: www.zordah.net Email: zordah zordah.net
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-usersrenaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
|
