Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> If I am forced to purchase a commercial scanner (which
seems likely),
> I certainly will be adding it to clamav, not replacing
what's worked
> perfectly for so long. I also intend to report on the
(highly
> probable) situation that our commercial virus scanner
has detected
> absolutely nothing when it comes time to renew it next
year.
>
> I appreciate and agree with all the pro clamav talk,
but assuming I
> will have to also have a commercial scanner, I'd still
love to hear
> about any experiences people have had with them and
Maia.
I've only tried trophie (trend) during my early days with
Maia. I think
the most important thing you can do, is choose one that's
daemonized to
prevent performance issues.
If they really have a lot of money to spend you could try to
pursue them
to buy a fully solution/appliance, for example ironport, and
then after
a year compare what's best. Let maia be in front and report
how many
items your solution/appliance picks up and say "hey
boss, last year we
wasted $10,000 on picking up XX items that our free solution
didn't pick
up".
Back on topic, I don't think it really matters which
anti-virus solution
you pick. My opinion is that they generally don't really
care about *nix
and make products that doesn't work as good as it should.
--
Erik
_______________________________________________
Maia-users mailing list
Maia-users renaissoft.com
http://www.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/maia-users
|
